Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 4, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIt is now easier to prove discriminatory harassment in New York. On August 12, 2019, the state enacted sweeping amendments to the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL), including a provision specifying that harassment need not be “severe or pervasive” in order to be legally actionable.

Under Gov. Andrew Cuomo, New York has significantly strengthened its protections against workplace sexual harassment. In 2018, the state incorporated several new legal requirements into the budget, including provisions that prohibit certain mandatory arbitration clauses and nondisclosure agreements; require reimbursement of funds paid by state agencies, state entities and public entities for the payment of awards adjudicated in sexual harassment claims; expand the legal protection for non-employees; and establish a model policy and training program regarding the prevention of sexual harassment in the workplace.
The latest legislation, Assembly Bill No. A8421, makes additional changes to the NYSHRL and expands many of the protections to all forms of harassment against protected classes. In addition, it lowers the bar for individuals pursuing harassment claims. Under the amended NYSHRL, a claimant need only prove that he or she has been subjected to “inferior terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of the individual’s membership in one or more of [the] protected categories,” regardless of whether such harassment would be considered severe or pervasive under existing court precedent applied to harassment claims.
“By ending the absurd legal standard that sexual harassment in the workplace needs to be ‘severe or pervasive’ and making it easier for workplace sexual harassment claims to be brought forward, we are sending a strong message that time is up on sexual harassment in the workplace and setting the standard of equity for women,” Gov. Cuomo said in a statement.
Employers may raise the affirmative defense that the “harassing conduct does not rise above the level of what a reasonable victim of discrimination with the same protected characteristic would consider petty slights or trivial inconveniences.” However, the Faragher-Ellerth defense is no longer available. The long-standing defense provides that when no tangible employment action is taken, the employer may avail itself of an affirmative defense, provided that the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior, and that the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer.
Below is a brief summary of several other key changes to the NYSHRL:
The new law will take effect in three phases. Effective immediately, employers must provide model sexual harassment policies and training materials in English and employee’s primary language. The elimination of the “severe and pervasive” standard takes effect in 60 days. Other provisions, such as extending the NYSHRL to all employers regardless of the number of employees, won’t take effect for 180 days.
Given the significance of the changes to New York law, employers should undertake a thorough review of their anti-harassment policies, procedures and training. Employment agreements, specifically those including mandatory arbitration and non-disclosure provisions, may also need to be amended to ensure compliance with the new requirements. For guidance, we recommend consulting with an experienced New York employment attorney.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Scott Heck, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Author: George McGowan

In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Author: George McGowan

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!