
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: May 8, 2023

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
On March 14, 2023, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP or Department) Commissioner Shawn M. LaTourette issued Administrative Order 2023-08 (AO 2023-08), which updates the State’s Natural Resource Restoration (NRD) Policy. The Order seeks to modernize guidance, improve transparency, and enhance public engagement regarding the development and implementation of NRD assessments and compensation projects.
Of particular relevance to potentially responsible parties, the Order outlines new NJDEP policies and practices for voluntarily resolving potential NRD liabilities. AO 2023-08 specifically directs the NJDEP to “encourage responsible parties to assess and voluntarily resolve their NRD liabilities in the course of performing their contaminated site remediation obligations.”
Natural resource damages are intended to compensate the public for the injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources. Natural resources are broadly defined to include “land, fish, wildlife, biota, air, water, ground water, drinking water supplies and other such resources.”
New Jersey is authorized to recover the “cost of restoration and replacement of any natural resource” under the New Jersey Spill Compensation Act (Spill Act). Several other state and federal statutes also provide the NJDEP with additional authority to require the investigation and restoration of injured natural resources. These federal statutes include the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Oil Pollution Act.
In 2017, New Jersey voters approved an amendment to the New Jersey Constitution (Article VIII, Section II, paragraph 9) that mandates funds from environmental settlements must be reinvested into anti-pollution efforts. Specifically, all State moneys received from settlements and awards in cases of environmental contamination relating to natural resource damages must be used for certain environmental purposes, which include to repair, replace, or restore damaged natural resources or to preserve the State’s natural resources. The amendment further provides that moneys must be spent in an area as close as possible to the geographical area in which the damage occurred.
AO 2023-08 confirms the NJDEP’s broad authority to pursue national resource damages. The Order expressly states that it is the policy of the Department, in discharging the Commissioner’s duty as Trustee of the public’s natural resources, to “pursue the assessment and restoration of injured or altered natural resources, including those injured by any past, present, or future discharge of hazardous substances, contaminants, or other pollutants reported to or otherwise discovered by the Department.”
To implement New Jersey’s Natural Resource Restoration Policy (NRRP), the Order states that the NJDEP should, “where in its discretion it deems appropriate,” pursue the assessment and restoration of injured natural resources through a “collaborative process” with responsible parties for the express and limited purpose of amicably resolving their potential NRD liabilities. When the NJDEP reaches amicable resolutions of NRD liabilities with responsible parties, it anticipates that such settlements will reflect a discounted NRD valuation in recognition of a responsible party’s cooperation, as well as the benefit to the public of avoiding the costs, uncertainty, and potential delays associated with litigation.
Pursuant to AO 2023-08, the NJDEP’s Office of Natural Resource Restoration (ONRR) and Contaminated Site Remediation and Redevelopment (CSRR) are directed to establish protocols and procedures that encourage responsible parties to assess and resolve potential NRD liabilities through the collaborative process. Such protocols may include the identification of information necessary to initiate the collaborative process, guidelines for submittal of information to the Department, and the development of relevant forms to facilitate information sharing, such as new or amended site remediation forms. ONRR is further directed to “develop technical assistance to support the collaborative process and facilitate the assessment of natural resource injuries” by responsible parties.
AO 2023-08 additionally provides that notwithstanding the further establishment of protocols and procedures, the NJDEP may determine to enter into a collaborative process with any responsible party that provides the following information to ONRR: (i) a written statement of interest in exploring the voluntary resolution of potential NRD liabilities; (ii) a summary of the operational history of the subject site with relevant information that describes the storage, use, and discharge of any hazardous substances or other pollutants giving rise to potential NRD liability; (iii) a description of the predischarge conditions at the site; (iv) a delineation of the nature, extent, and duration of the subject contamination exceeding predischarge conditions and information pertinent to the assessment of injuries to natural resources; (v) a description of the environmental features and media at and in the immediate vicinity of the site; (vi) a proposal to resolve the potentially responsible party’s primary and compensatory restoration obligations; and (vii) an optional suggestion of candidate restoration projects the DEP may consider funding.
Notably, AO 2023-08 is intended to be prospective in nature and, thus, will not impact any ongoing collaborative processes, settlement discussions, or administrative or legal actions concerning alleged injuries to natural resources. The Order also expressly provides that the NJDEP reserves “all rights to pursue legal action where necessary and appropriate in the Commissioner’s discretion and in consultation with the Attorney General.”
The Order also directs the NJDEP to create new mechanisms to solicit input from the public in the planning and implementation of natural resource restoration activities. Such mechanisms include the creation of the Natural Resource Restoration Advisory Council (NRRAC), which is tasked with providing insight and feedback concerning the NJDEP’s identification, planning, and implementation of restoration projects, and to assist the NJDEP in communicating restoration project objectives and outcomes to the public.
AO 2023-08 also calls on the ONRR to establish a public dashboard on the NJDEP website that that identifies each restoration project administered by the Department as of the date of the Order, its status, funding source, and any other information relevant to the directives set forth in the Order. Additional steps to improve transparency include the creation of an archive of past NRD recoveries and natural resource restoration projects on the NJDEP website.
NRD suits have increased significantly over the past several years. Given that such damages can often outweigh the costs of remediation, businesses should fully understand their potential liability as well as the mechanisms that may be available to resolve it.
The attorneys of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group have significant experience handling NRD claims in New Jersey. We encourage you to contact us with any questions or concerns about AO 2023-08 and its impact on your potential NRD liability.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!