Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

NJDEP Proposing to Amend Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Date: February 1, 2021

Key Contacts

Back
Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) is proposing changes to its Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance (VIT Guidance)…

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) is proposing changes to its Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance (VIT Guidance) that will significantly increase the frequency and number of soil-gas sub-slab (SSSG) samples that would be required to be collected as part of the vapor intrusion investigation component of remediation of contaminated property.  If this proposal is adopted, it would significantly impact entities that develop Brownfield properties for use as large warehouses.

NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance

N.J.A.C. 7:26E-1.8 defines Vapor Intrusion (VI) as “the migration of volatile chemicals from the subsurface into overlying buildings through subsurface soils or preferential pathways (such as underground utilities).” As noted by the NJDEP, the presence of volatile compounds in soil or groundwater offers the potential for chemical vapors to migrate through subsurface soils and along preferential pathways, potentially impacting the indoor air (IA) quality of affected buildings.

The NJDEP’s VIT Guidance is designed to help individuals responsible for conducting remediation, such as licensed site remediation professionals, comply with the NJDEP’s requirements established by the Technical Requirements for Site Remediation.

Proposed Change to SSSG Sampling Requirements

The VIT Guidance was last amended in January 2018 (Version 4.1). The NJDEP is now proposing several new revisions.  One of the most significant changes involves the requirements for conducting vapor intrusion investigations, which will be amended to reflect the recent incorporation of vapor intrusion screening levels in the NJDEP’s official remediation standards. The proposed changes call for increased SSSG VI sampling frequency, particularly for larger buildings.

As the name implies, SSSG samples are collected from below the building foundation or slab. As highlighted by the NJDEP in the existing VIT Guidance, SSSG sampling can be useful for assessing the VI pathway from several perspectives, including:

  • The primary utility for collecting SSSG samples is to assess if there is a potential for a complete VI pathway to exist. A VI pathway is considered complete only when the following occurs: a source of vapors, related to a discharge (e.g. soil and/or groundwater plume), is identified; and
  • A pathway connects the source to potential human receptors inside a building.

The VIT Guidance sets forth the minimum number of SSSG samples that must be collected. It also lists certain building-specific features and conditions that necessitate additional samples, which include, but are not limited to the following:

  • Presence of sensitive populations
  • Past usage (e.g., dry cleaners, vapor degreasers, underground storage tanks)
  • Building construction (separate foundations, type of slab, footers, utility lines etc.)
  • Presence of earthen or damaged floors
  • Presence of sump pits
  • Requests from building owner
  • Elevator pits
  • Portion of building overlying or contacting the highest levels of VOC
  • Areas of greatest exposure (playrooms, family rooms, classrooms, offices)
  • Homogeneity and composition of sub-slab material

In addition, NJDEP is proposing to increase the SSSG VI sampling frequency requirements as follows:

Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance Table

Key Takeaways

The NJDEP is currently soliciting feedback regarding these proposed changes. Assuming they become final, entities that plan to redevelop brownfields and other properties requiring remediation will need to take the new requirements into account when determining the path forward and costs of such projects.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk post image

BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk"
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress post image

Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress"
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey post image

Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!