
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: November 13, 2019

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comGov. Phil Murphy recently signed legislation into law that offers guidance for how funding for the preservation of open space, parks, farmland and historic sites should be allocated. The latest framework, which is set forth in Senate Bill 2920, increases the share awarded to farmland and historic preservation projects.

In 2014, New Jersey voters approved a constitutional amendment that dedicates four percent of Corporation Business Tax revenue each year for a number of environmental programs, including open space, farmland, and historic preservation, water programs, public and private site remediation, and underground storage tank programs. The allocation for the preservation of open space, farmland, and historic sites will increase to six percent in fiscal year 2020.
The new program, which will remain in place for the next 30 years, ended the previous tax scheme under which four percent of corporate tax revenue was set aside for environmental programs. Open space preservation programs previously relied on a series of bond acts to fund the Garden State Preservation Trust Fund, which had been depleted.
Specifically with regard to open space, farmland, and historic preservation, commencing July 1, 2019 (i.e., for State fiscal year 2020 and thereafter), of the six-percent CBT dedication, the State Constitution dedicates annually 78 percent for the following purposes:
While the constitutional amendment ensures continued funding, there is less money to go around. Senate Bill 2920 provides guidance regarding how open space funds will be divvied up going forward. For State fiscal year 2020 and thereafter, CBT revenues would be allocated as follows:
The new law provides further guidelines with respect to each purpose. Of the funding allocated each year for recreation and conservation purposes pursuant to this bill: 60 percent would be used for State open space acquisition and development projects; 30 percent would be used for grants and loans to fund local government open space acquisition and development projects; and 10 percent would be used for grants to fund open space acquisition and development projects undertaken by qualifying tax-exempt nonprofit organizations.
With respect to funding for State open space acquisition and development projects: 45 percent would be used for acquisition projects, including Blue Acres projects, and 55 percent would be used for development projects (the funds were divided equally under prior law). Of the funding for State open space acquisition projects, a minimum of 10 percent would be allocated for Blue Acres projects. In addition, of the allocated funding for open space acquisition and development projects by local government units, up to 10 percent would be used to fund stewardship activities, rather than up to two percent as provided by current law.
With regard to farmland preservation, Senate Bill 2920 amends the current law to provide that, for State fiscal year 2020 and thereafter, of the moneys allocated for farmland preservation, up to four percent (an increase from three percent) may be used for stewardship activities on preserved farmland. It also amends the definition of stewardship activity to include projects that improve the resiliency of farmland soils. In addition, the new law provides that stewardship activities undertaken on farmland on which (1) the pinelands development credits have been acquired pursuant to the “Pinelands Protection Act,” and the pinelands comprehensive management plan adopted pursuant thereto, or the development rights have been acquired pursuant to a transfer of development rights program for the Highlands Region established pursuant to the “Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act,” and (2) there is a deed restriction approved by the SADC, would be eligible to receive funding from the SADC.
Beginning July 1, 2022, and annually thereafter, the new law directs the Garden State Preservation Trust (GSPT) to review the appropriations of constitutionally dedicated CBT moneys to, and the expenditures thereof by, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), State Agriculture Development Committee (SADC), and New Jersey Historic Trust (NJHT) for their respective programs. A recommendation by the GSPT, however, would not alter the program funding allocations unless authorized by the Legislature.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!