
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: January 16, 2018

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Legislature is moving forward with efforts to invalidate a rule enacted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) earlier this year. The regulation amends the septic system density standards in the Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act (Highlands Act) and clears the way for continued land development in the environmentally-sensitive region.

In 2004, the New Jersey Legislature passed the New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act (Highlands Act) to establish a regional land management plan aimed at protecting and preserving the natural resources of the region. Because the Highlands region provides much of the state’s drinking water, the Highlands Act requires the DEP to establish septic density standards at a level that will maintain existing water quality. The Highlands Act specifically requires the DEP’s rules to include “a septic system density standard established at a level to prevent the degradation of water quality, or to require the restoration of water quality, and to protect ecological uses from individual, secondary, and cumulative impacts, in consideration of deep aquifer recharge available for dilution.”
As explained by the DEP, the agency uses nutrients found in septic waste, called nitrates, to assess water quality. Septic density formulas are based on the acreage of land necessary to dilute nitrates to levels that will not negatively impact water quality. In 2008, the DEP’s septic density standards were set to allow one septic system for every 88 acres of forested area and one septic system for every 25 acres that is not forested.
Last year, the DEP proposed amended septic density standards for the Highlands region. Because they “could result in up to 1,145 additional septic systems, or about 12 percent more individual septic systems than under the existing rule,” the standards have been widely criticized by environmental groups. Nonetheless, the DEP adopted the new standards on April 21, 2017.
New Jersey lawmakers have also criticized the DEP’s Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act Rules, arguing that they violate the legislative intent of the Highlands Act. Accordingly, the Legislature is working to force the DEP to rescind them.
Under the State of New Jersey’s Constitution, the Legislature may review any rule or regulation adopted or proposed by an administrative agency to determine if it is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If lawmakers determine that a rule or regulation violates legislative intent, they can seek to invalidate it.
In June, the Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 192 (1R). The resolution states that “the new standards contained in the May 2, 2016 rule proposal do not comply with the requirement in the Highlands Act for the septic system density standards to be established at a level to prevent the degradation of water quality, or to require the restoration of water quality, and to protect ecological uses.”
The resolution raises concerns that the DEP relied in part on nitrate data generated from wells sampled between 2004 and 2011, after the date of enactment of the Highlands Act. As set forth in ACR 192, “the proposed standards do not accurately preserve or maintain 2004 water quality conditions or restore water quality, as required by the act, but instead, reflect the development and accompanying degradation in groundwater quality that has occurred since 2004 and allows water quality to continue to degrade.”
The resolution also contends that the DEP’s rule proposal directly contradicts the language of the Highlands Act. It notes DEP’s proposed rule amendments seek to “relate the septic system density standards to the . . . Highlands Regional Master Plan (RMP),” but section 34 of the Highlands Act requires, conversely, that the RMP be based on the DEP’s rules.
After passage by the Legislature, ACR 192 was subsequently filed with the Secretary of State and transmitted to the Commissioner of Environmental Protection. Now that the DEP has declined to rescind or amend the septic density standards, the Legislature must now reapprove the resolution in order for it to take effect.
Under the New Jersey Constitution, the Legislature may invalidate the rule following a public hearing held by either House, the placement of a transcript of the public hearing on the desks of the members of each House in open meeting followed by the passage of at least 20 calendar days, and a vote of a majority of each House in favor of a concurrent resolution invalidating the rule. Most recently, the Senate Environment and Energy Committee voted unanimously in favor of the resolution (SCR-163).
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan

Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: George McGowan

Most New Jersey business owners purchase insurance policies, file them away, and assume they are protected if a claim arises. Without a regular insurance coverage review, many companies discover gaps only after a lawsuit, cyberattack, property loss, or other significant event occurs. An annual insurance coverage review can help businesses identify potential risks, ensure their […]
Author: George McGowan

Businesses and individuals often encounter situations where another party breaches a contract, fails to pay a debt, or continues harmful conduct. In many such disputes, a precisely drafted demand letter or cease-and-desist letter serves as a powerful legal tool. It can frequently resolve the dispute and avoid litigation. While demand or cease-and-desist letters can resolve […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!