
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: October 16, 2020

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comNew Jersey will likely soon have the country’s strictest plastic bag ban. Under a bill passed by the New Jersey Legislature on September 24, 2020, even single-use paper bags would be prohibited. The legislation, Senate Bill No. 864, also bans polystyrene foam food containers, and foodservice businesses would be prohibited from offering plastic straws except upon request.

Beginning 18 months after the effective date of Senate Bill 864, a store or food service business would be prohibited from providing or selling a single-use plastic carryout bag to a customer. In addition, a grocery store would be prohibited from providing or selling a single-use paper carryout bag to a customer. However, the prohibitions in the bill would not apply to the following:
The prohibitions would also not apply to a reusable carryout bag, which is a bag that is made of polypropylene, PET nonwoven fabric, nylon, cloth, hemp products, or other machine washable fabric; has stitched handles; and is designed and manufactured for multiple reuses.
Beginning 18 months after the effective date of the bill, businesses would be prohibited from selling or offering for sale in the State any polystyrene foam foodservice product. Also, a food service business would be prohibited from providing or selling any food in a polystyrene foam foodservice product. However, the following items would be exempt from the prohibition on polystyrene foam foodservice products for a period of two years after the prohibition takes effect:
The NJDEP would be authorized to extend any exemption listed above for additional periods not to exceed one year upon a written determination that there is no cost-effective and readily available alternative for the item. Additionally, the NJDEP would be authorized, upon written application by a person or food service business, to waive the prohibitions on polystyrene foam foodservice products for the person or food service business for a period of up to one year if: (1) there is no feasible and commercially available alternative for a specific polystyrene foam foodservice product; or (2) the person or foodservice business has less than $500,000 in gross annual income and there is no reasonably affordable, commercially-available alternative to the polystyrene foam foodservice product. The bill authorizes the NJDEP to prescribe the form and manner of an application for a waiver.
Beginning one year after the effective date of the bill, a food service business would only be permitted to provide a single-use plastic straw to a customer upon the request of the customer. A store, however, would be permitted to provide other types of straws, such as paper or reusable metal straws, without limitation.
Under the bill, the Department of State, in consultation with NJDEP, would be required to establish a program to assist businesses in complying with the new requirements. Such assistance would include developing and publishing on its website guidance on compliance with the bill, and establishing an online clearinghouse of vendors who provide environmentally sound alternatives to single-use plastic carryout bags, single-use paper carryout bags, polystyrene foam food service products, and single-use plastic straws.
The NJDEP, a municipality, and any entity certified pursuant to the County Environmental Health Act would have the authority to enforce the bill’s provisions; with the exception that the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) would enforce the provisions of the bill concerning single-use plastic straws.
Businesses violating the bill would receive a warning on first offense, a fine up to $1,000 for a second offense, and a monetary fine of up to $5,000 for a third or subsequent offense. If the violation is of a continuing nature, each day during which it continues would constitute an additional, separate, and distinct offense.
A spokesman for Gov. Phil Murphy has stated that he plans to sign the bill. The ban would then begin 18 months after the legislation goes into effect. Once in effect, the state-wide law would preempt the dozens of municipal plastic bag ordinances enacted in recent years.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!