Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 5, 2022
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew Jersey condominium and homeowners’ associations should review their governing documents to ensure compliance with a new law requiring the removal of discriminatory restrictive covenants. Gov. Phil Murphy signed the legislation (A-5390/SB-2861) into law on November 8, 2021, and it took effect immediately.
Restrictive covenants in deeds for real property that establish certain restrictions on the ownership or use of real property were already prohibited under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD). This prohibition includes restrictions on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, affectional or sexual orientation, familial status, disability, liability for service in the Armed Forces of the United States, nationality, sex, gender identity or expression, or source of lawful income used for rental or mortgage payments.
The new law goes one step further by requiring an unlawful and unenforceable restrictive covenant that currently exists in a deed for real property to be removed. According to its sponsors:
Unsuspecting homeowners or potential homebuyers who encounter restrictive language in a deed and do not understand the intricacies of the “Law Against Discrimination” may be discouraged from buying a home or continuing to reside in a home for which the ownership document, the deed, contains this language. Furthermore, a person who has purchased a home without realizing that such language is contained in the deed may feel shocked and upset after reading the deed.
Under A-5390/SB-2861, a deed recorded on or after January 1, 2022, may not contain a reference to the specific portion of a restrictive covenant purporting to restrict the ownership or use of real property as prohibited by the LAD, specifically N.J.S.A. 10:5-4 and 10:5-12. Additionally, a county clerk or a register of deeds and mortgages must refuse to accept any deed submitted for recordation that references the specific portion of any such restrictive covenant.
To address deeds recorded with such restrictive covenants, the new law creates a mechanism for property owners to release such a restrictive covenant by recording a “Certificate of Release of Certain Prohibited Covenants” with the county clerk, or register of deeds and mortgages, as appropriate, in the county where the real property is located. There is no filing fee, or any other fee, charged to the owner of a real property for the filing of this certificate. Property owners may record a certificate prior to recordation of a deed conveying real property to a purchaser, or when a real property owner discovers that such a prohibited covenant exists and chooses to affirmatively release it.
The new law also requires homeowners’ or property owners’ associations, cooperative corporations, condominium associations, and planned communities to be proactive in removing prohibited restrictions from their governing documents. Within 90 days of the enactment, boards must review the association’s governing documents to determine whether those documents contain any restriction, covenant, or condition, that prohibits or limits the conveyance, encumbrance, rental, occupancy, or use of real property as prohibited under the LAD.
If an association finds such an unlawful restriction, covenant, or condition in any of those documents, it must amend the document or documents to remove the restriction, covenant, or condition. Removal of a prohibited restriction, covenant, or condition does not require approval of the members of the association, notwithstanding any provision of the governing documents to the contrary.
If, after the review and amendment of governing documents has been completed, a board receives a written request from a member of the association to remove from those documents language that the member believes to be an unlawful restriction, covenant, or condition that prohibits or limits the conveyance, encumbrance, rental, occupancy, or use of real property as prohibited by the LAD, the board must immediately undertake a review of the document or documents. The review must be completed within 30 days of the member’s written request. If the board determines that the member is correct, the board must amend the document or documents to remove the restriction, covenant, or condition within 30 days of its determination.
Notably, the new law does not establish a private cause of action by or against an association, a board, a member, or the public for acting or not acting to remove or not remove an unlawful restriction, covenant, or condition.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Christopher Dzwilewski, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Breach of contract disputes are the most common type of business litigation. Therefore, nearly all New York and New Jersey businesses will likely have to deal with a contract dispute at least once. Understanding when to file a breach of contract lawsuit and how long you have to sue for breach of contract is essential […]
Author: Brittany P. Tarabour
Closing your business can be a difficult and challenging task. For corporations, the process includes formal approval of the dissolution, winding up operations, resolving tax liabilities, and filing all required paperwork. Whether you need to understand how to dissolve a corporation in New York or New Jersey, it’s imperative to take all of the proper […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Commercial leases can take a variety of forms, which is often confusing for both landlords and tenants. Understanding the different types, especially the gross lease structure, is important when selecting the lease that best suits your needs. One key distinction between lease types is how rent is calculated and paid. This article addresses the two […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
Over the past year, brick-and-mortar stores have closed their doors at a record pace. Fluctuating consumer preferences, the rise of online shopping platforms, and ongoing economic uncertainty continue to put pressure on the retail industry. When a retailer seeks bankruptcy protection, a myriad of other businesses are often impacted. Whether you are a supplier, customer, […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Since his inauguration two months ago, Donald Trump’s administration and the Congress it controls have indicated important upcoming policy changes. These changes will impact financial services policies and priorities. The changes will particularly affect cryptocurrency, as well as banking rules and regulations. Key Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency For example, in the burgeoning cryptocurrency business environment, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The retail sector has experienced a wave of bankruptcy filings over the last year. Brick-and-mortar businesses in financial distress include big-name brands like Big Lots, Party City, The Container Store, and Vitamin Shoppe. When large retailers seek bankruptcy protection, they are not the only businesses impacted. Landlords can be particularly hard hit. While commercial landlords […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!