Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 4, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York’s “Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Handling Act,” better known as the SHIELD Act, takes effect on March 21, 2020. Businesses must review their information security programs to assess the private information they collect and implement data security requirements specified in the SHIELD Act.

The SHIELD Act broadens the scope of information covered under New York’s existing data breach notification law and updates the notification requirements when there has been a breach of data. Notably, the new law’s data breach notification requirements apply to any person or entity with private information of a New York resident, not just to those that conduct business in New York State. That means New Jersey businesses, specifically, and all business, generally, with employees and/or customers in New York will also be subject to these new compliance obligations.
Under the SHIELD Act, “any person or business that owns or licenses computerized data which includes private information of a resident of New York shall develop, implement and maintain reasonable safeguards to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of the private information including, but not limited to, disposal of data.” Small businesses, defined as those with less than 50 employees and under $3 million in gross revenue; or less than $5 million in assets, will be deemed compliant if they “implement and maintain reasonable safeguards that are appropriate to the size and complexity of the small business to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of the private information.”
The bill also contains a carve-out for certain other businesses. It provides that “certified compliant entities,” defined as those already regulated by, and compliant with, existing or future regulations of any federal or New York State government entity (including NYS DFS regulations; regulations under Gramm-Leach-Bliley; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) regulations, or with International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cybersecurity standards, will receive safe harbor from enforcement actions under the SHIELD Act.
The SHIELD Act broadens the scope of information covered under New York’s existing data breach notification law, the NYS Information Security Breach and Notification Act. Existing regulations only applied to personally-identifying information that included social security numbers. Under the SHIELD Act, the definition of private information is expanded to include “any information concerning a natural person which, because of name, number, personal mark, or other identifier, can be used to identify such natural person.”
The statute’s data protection and data breach notification obligations apply to “private information” in combination with one, or more of the following data sets:
The definition of a data breach will also be expanded to include unauthorized access to private information. New York’s previous data breach law only covered the unauthorized acquisition of computerized data. Under the SHIELD Act, the definition of “breach of the security of the system” is expanded to include unauthorized “access” of computerized data that compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of private information, and it provides sample indicators of access. In determining whether information has been accessed, or is reasonably believed to have been accessed, by an unauthorized person or a person without valid authorization, such business may consider, among other factors, indications that the information was viewed, communicated with, used, or altered by a person without valid authorization or by an unauthorized person.
Failure to provide required reasonable data security will be considered be a violation of section 349 of the General Business Law, thereby authorizing New York’s Attorney General to bring suit against any business for noncompliance. Businesses may be fined $5,000 for each violation or up to $20 per instance of failed notification, provided that the latter’s aggregate amount doesn’t exceed $250,000. The upside for businesses is that the SHIELD Act does not create a private right of action.
It is pertinent for businesses to review their information security programs to assess the private information they collect and implement data security requirements specified in the SHIELD Act. This is a time-consuming and complex process. The compliance date is looming and business are best served if they begin their review process sooner rather than later.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!