Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

The New Tax Law Introduces Qualified Business Income - The New Panacea

Author: James F. McDonough

Date: January 4, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

No Provision in the New Tax Law has Received More Attention Than the New Section 199A, Which Defines the New Term “Qualified Business Income”

No provision in the new tax law has received more attention than the new section 199A. Section 199A defines a new term called “Qualified Business Income” (“QBI”) and further provides non-corporate taxpayers, including trusts and estates, will be entitled to receive a deduction for a percentage of QBI. The 20% deduction is not an itemized deduction from adjusted gross income, rather it is allowed as a deduction reducing taxable income.

The New Tax Law Introduces Qualified Business Income (QBI)
Photo courtesy of Qusai Akoud (Unsplash.com)

QBI is the net amount of “qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss” received from any qualified trade or business of the taxpayer that is a partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship to the extent that the items are effectively connected with a business within the United States (a “Qualified Trade or Business” or “QTB”).   A non-corporate taxpayer receiving QBI is entitled to deduct:

  • the lesser of the “combined qualified business income amount” of the taxpayer, or (b) 20% of the excess, if any, of the taxable income of the taxpayer for the tax year over the sum of net capital gain and the aggregate amount of the qualified cooperative dividends of the taxpayer for the tax year;

Plus

  • the lesser of: (i) 20% of the aggregate amount of the qualified cooperative dividends of the taxpayer for the tax year, or (ii) taxable income (reduced by the net capital gain) of the taxpayer for the tax year.

Definitions Within Definitions

The rub is that there are definitions within definitions and understanding the 20% deduction is navigable only if you have patience.

The “combined qualified business income amount” means the deductible amount for each qualified trade or business of the taxpayer (defined as 20% of the taxpayer’s QBI subject to the W-2 wage limitation discussed below; plus (ii) 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership income of the taxpayer for the tax year. QBI does not include reasonable compensation paid to the taxpayer; any guaranteed payment to a partner for services to QTB under (Section 707(c)); or a payment by the QTB under (Section. 707(a)) to a partner for services to the QTB or any specified investment items. Thus, all income is not necessarily QBI.

A QTB is any trade or business except that of an employee or a specified trade or business, such as the practice of law, accounting, health, investment and similar businesses that rely on reputation. Thus, a specified practice, such as medicine, is arguably excluded were it not for the income threshold. Stated simply, the prohibition does not apply until income levels exceed $315,000 for married individuals filing jointly ($157,500 for other individuals) subject to a phase-in applicable percentage. Thus, the benefits of the deduction are indirectly extended to lower paid practitioners. Note engineering and architecture are denied indirect benefit regardless the level of income.

Perhaps the key provision is the limitation on the 20% deduction because most taxpayers understand the income generated from their business. The 20% deduction cannot exceed the greater of: (1) 50% of the W-2 wages from the QTB (“W-2 wage limitation”), or (2) the sum of 25% of the W-2 wages paid with respect to the QTB plus 2.5% of the unadjusted basis, immediately after acquisition, of all “qualified property.” Qualified property is defined in §199A(b)(6)) as tangible, depreciable property which is held by and available for use in the QTB by the close of the tax year, is used during the year and whose depreciation period has not ended. Perhaps the most notable provision is the later one, which allows the 20% deduction to qualify real estate operations.

Examples

There are two examples in the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference that may be helpful to the reader.

Example 1 – Husband (H) and Wife (W) file a joint return and show $520,000 of taxable income and receive $10,000 in REIT dividends.   H’s share of QBI is $300,000 and his 20% is $60,000. H’s allocable share of wages paid by the business is $100,000 and 50% of that figure is $50,000.  Because the joint income is above $315,000, the phase-in of the wage limit applies so the $50,000 is reduced by $2,000 which is 20% of the difference between $60,000 and $50,000. Thus, H’s QBI is $58,000 ($60,000-$2,000).

W has a current QBI of $325,000 and W-2 wages of $150,000 from her sole proprietorship. Once again, because the joint income is above $315,000, the phase-in of the wage limit applies. 80% is applicable percentage that is applied to QBI of $325,000 and W-2 wages of $150,000, and the results are $260,000 and $120,000, respectively. In order to determine the deduction, W’s QBI of $260,000 is multiplied by 20% (limitation) and W-2 wages of $120,000 by the 50% (wage limitation) and the results are $52,000 and $60,000, respectively. W’s deductible is $52,000, the lesser of the two figures.

H and W combined QBI is $112,000 and is comprised of the deductible amount from each ($58,000 plus $52,000) plus 20% of REIT dividends ($2,000). Their deduction is limited to $104,000 which is the lesser of $112,000 or $104,000, which is 20% of taxable income of $520,000.

Example 2 – Husband (H) and Wife (W) file a joint return and show $200,000 of taxable income and a qualified business carryover loss of $50,000.   H is a sole proprietor of QTB and has income of $150,000 so his OBI is $30,000. Because the joint income is below $315,000, the wage limit does not apply. W has a current $40,000 loss so her qualified business loss is $8,000. Once again, the joint income is below $315,000 so the wage limit does not apply. H and W combined business income is $12,000 consisting of $30,000 from H less $8,000 from W less $10,000 from the carryover loss (20% of $50,000). The deduction is limited to $12,000 which is the lesser $40,000 (20% of $150,000) or $12,000.

It remains to be seen whether the section 199A will transform existing business structures to the extent that some predict although the choice of entity decision for new businesses has been made more opaque for the average person.

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, James McDonough, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework post image

When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework"
A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now post image

A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now"
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses post image

Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]

Author: John D. Giampolo

Link to post with title - "Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses"
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know post image

Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know"
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law post image

Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law"
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions post image

The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!