Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 22, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOn January 25, 2023, by a unanimous vote, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) issued a proposed rule to implement Section 27B of the Securities Act of 1933, to reduce conflicts of interest in certain securitization transactions. As proposed, Securities Act Rule 192 would prohibit securitization participants from engaging in certain transactions that could incentivize a securitization participant to structure an asset-backed security (ABS) in a way that would put the securitization participant’s interests ahead of those of ABS investors.
Securities Act Rule 192 was authorized under Section 27B of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) in response to conflicts of interests in the securitization market, which contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. The SEC originally proposed Rule 127B to implement Section 27B in September 2011. As set forth in the rule proposal, “The re-proposed rule targets transactions that effectively represent a bet against a securitization and focuses on the types of transactions that were the subject of regulatory and Congressional investigations and were among the most widely cited examples of ABS-related misconduct during the lead up to the financial crisis of 2007-2009.”
Securities Act Rule 192 would prohibit an underwriter, placement agent, initial purchaser, or sponsor of an ABS, including affiliates or subsidiaries of those entities, from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any transaction that would involve or result in any material conflict of interest between the securitization participant and an investor in such ABS. Such transactions would be deemed “conflicted transactions.”
Under the new rule, a “conflicted transaction” is defined to include two main components. As set forth in a fact sheet provided by the SEC, the first component is whether the transaction is:
The second component centers on materiality. The key question is whether there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider the relevant transaction important to the investor’s investment decision, including a decision whether to retain the ABS.
Under the proposed rule, the prohibition on conflicted transactions would commence on the date on which a person has reached, or has taken substantial steps to reach, an agreement that such person will become a securitization participant with respect to an ABS. It would terminate one year after the date of the first closing of the sale of the relevant ABS.
Proposed Securities Act Rule 192would provide three exceptions, all of which are contingent upon participants satisfying certain conditions set forth in the rule. The exceptions are:
Notably, the proposed rule would require a securitization participant relying on any of the exceptions to implement compliance programs reasonably designed to ensure the securitization participant’s compliance with the conditions applicable to those exceptions, including reasonably designed written policies and procedures.
Rule 192 includes significant and broad definitional details of:
The SEC’s public comment period ends on March 27, 2023 or 30 days following the publication of the proposing release in the Federal Register, whichever period is longer.
Absent details in the adopting Release, Rule 192 becomes effective upon issuance of Final Rule. Expect substantial comments focused on defined terms, exemptions, and other features that remove ambiguities and overly general provisions. To determine how you may be impacted by the SEC’s proposed rule, we encourage you to consult with Paul A. Lieberman or other member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Financial Services and Regulatory Practice Group. Our experienced team routinely advises broker-dealers, investment advisers, insurance companies, hedge funds, and other regulated entities, providing cost-effective, practical advice on how to meet the requirements of new laws, rules and regulations.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Paul A. Lieberman or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at (201) 896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Breach of contract disputes are the most common type of business litigation. Therefore, nearly all New York and New Jersey businesses will likely have to deal with a contract dispute at least once. Understanding when to file a breach of contract lawsuit and how long you have to sue for breach of contract is essential […]
Author: Brittany P. Tarabour
Closing your business can be a difficult and challenging task. For corporations, the process includes formal approval of the dissolution, winding up operations, resolving tax liabilities, and filing all required paperwork. Whether you need to understand how to dissolve a corporation in New York or New Jersey, it’s imperative to take all of the proper […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Commercial leases can take a variety of forms, which is often confusing for both landlords and tenants. Understanding the different types, especially the gross lease structure, is important when selecting the lease that best suits your needs. One key distinction between lease types is how rent is calculated and paid. This article addresses the two […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
Over the past year, brick-and-mortar stores have closed their doors at a record pace. Fluctuating consumer preferences, the rise of online shopping platforms, and ongoing economic uncertainty continue to put pressure on the retail industry. When a retailer seeks bankruptcy protection, a myriad of other businesses are often impacted. Whether you are a supplier, customer, […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Since his inauguration two months ago, Donald Trump’s administration and the Congress it controls have indicated important upcoming policy changes. These changes will impact financial services policies and priorities. The changes will particularly affect cryptocurrency, as well as banking rules and regulations. Key Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency For example, in the burgeoning cryptocurrency business environment, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The retail sector has experienced a wave of bankruptcy filings over the last year. Brick-and-mortar businesses in financial distress include big-name brands like Big Lots, Party City, The Container Store, and Vitamin Shoppe. When large retailers seek bankruptcy protection, they are not the only businesses impacted. Landlords can be particularly hard hit. While commercial landlords […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!