Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

New York Seeks to Combat Terrorism Through New AML Regulation

Author: Robert A. Marsico

Date: December 17, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

New AML Regulations to Combat Terrorism

As the government seeks to address the growing threat from ISIS and other terrorist groups, it is also increasing business oversight of financial services organizations which may to be utilized by terrorists as funding mechanisms.

aml regulations

Most recently, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo proposed a new anti-money laundering regulation that would require senior executives to certify the effectiveness of their anti-money laundering (AML) procedures. The new regulation would apply to all banks, trust companies, private bankers, savings banks and savings and loan associations chartered under the New York Banking Law, as well as all branches and agencies of foreign banking corporations licensed under the Banking Law to conduct banking operations in New York.

The goal of the proposed banking regulation is to help stem the flow of funding to terrorists and other criminals. “Money is the fuel that feeds the fire of international terrorism,” Gov. Cuomo said in a statement. “At a time of heightened global security concerns, it is especially vital that banks and regulators do everything they can to stop that flow of illicit funds.”

The Governor also highlighted that investigations conducted by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) have revealed “serious shortcomings in the transaction monitoring and filtering programs of these institutions” and “that a lack of robust governance, oversight, and accountability at senior levels of these institutions has contributed to these shortcomings.”

Proposed AML Regulations

Under the proposed Transaction Monitoring and Filtering Program regulation, New York financial institutions would have a number of new compliance obligations, such as:

  • Maintain a Transaction Monitoring Program: Each regulated institution must maintain a manual or automated system for monitoring transactions after their execution for potential Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)/AML violations and Suspicious Activity Reporting. Among the minimum requirements for the systems, the proposed AML regulations require that they must be “subject to an on-going analysis to assess the continued relevancy of the detection scenarios, the underlying rules, threshold values, parameters, and assumptions.”
  •  Maintain a Watch List Filtering Program: Every regulated institution must maintain a manual or automated system for the purpose of interdicting transactions, before their execution, that are prohibited by applicable sanctions, including OFAC and other sanctions lists, politically exposed persons lists, and internal watch lists. Among the minimum requirements, the systems must “be subject to on-going analysis to assess the logic and performance of the technology or tools for matching names and accounts, as well as the watch lists and the threshold settings to see if they continue to map to the risks of the institution.”
  •  Testing/Altering Filters: The AML regulations expressly state: “No regulated institution may make changes or alterations to the Transaction Monitoring and Filtering Program to avoid or minimize filing suspicious activity reports, or because the institution does not have the resources to review the number of alerts, or to otherwise avoid complying with regulatory requirements.”
  •  Annual Certification: Financial institutions would be required to submit annual certifications, duly executed by their chief compliance officer or functional equivalent, that confirm their systems comply with the regulation. The requirement is modeled on the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

 Repercussions for violating these AML regulations

Violation of the AML regulations could result in serious legal headaches for New York financial institutions and their compliance officers. If banks fail to deter prohibited transactions, they face financial penalties or could be forced to terminate their chief compliance officers. CCOs could also be subject to criminal penalties for false or inaccurate certifications.

The proposed AML regulations are, in some ways, more strict than those established under federal regulations. Accordingly, they signal that the Cuomo Administration plans to continue its tough stance on money laundering and other practices utilized by terrorist organizations. The rules are now subject to a 45-day notice and comment period.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract post image

Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]

Author: Graham Staton

Link to post with title - "Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract"
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement? post image

Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?"
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know post image

Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know"
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split post image

Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!