
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comPartner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comThe distinction between a material and non-material contract breach impacts the legal recourse available to a Monmouth County business. After a material breach, the aggrieved party does not need to perform its part of the contract.
In some cases, a material breach will be obvious. For instance, if a band is hired to perform at an event on a specific date and fails to show up without a valid excuse, the breach is likely material.
In other situations, the distinction is far less clear, and the parties should consult with a Monmouth County business lawyer to determine the type of breach and the available remedies. There are several factors to consider when determining whether a contract breach is material, including:
How far along are the parties in completing their obligations under the contract? A court is more likely to find a non-material breach in the later stages of an agreement. |
How extensive is the failure?The court will evaluate the losses suffered by the non-breaching party to determine if they impact the heart of the bargain. If so, it will generally find a material breach. |
What was the intent of the parties? If the court finds that the breaching party acted unfairly or in bad faith, it is more likely to characterize the breach as material. |
How easy is it to rectify the breach? If the problem could be remedied using reasonable effort and expense, the court is more likely to find a minor breach. |
How will the breaching party be impacted if the other party is not obligated to perform? Even though the breaching party may be responsible for the problem, the court will still evaluate the severity of the impact (e.g., forfeiture) if the non-breaching party’s performance is excused. |
Does the contract address breaches?In some case, the terms of the contract specify what constitutes a material breach. The court will look to those provisions to make its determination. |
The type of breach will impact the legal remedies available to the non-breaching party. If the breach is material, the aggrieved party can:
File a lawsuit to recover damages and continue the contract, or |
File a lawsuit to recover damages and cancel its performance under the contract |
If the contract breach is minor, the non-breaching party may only sue to recover damages.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!