A hedge fund operator accused of securities fraud was recently sentenced to three months in prison for obstruction of justice…
A hedge fund operator accused of securities fraud was recently sentenced to three months in prison for obstruction of justice. The charges stemmed from lying to investigators during a deposition conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Niket Jain, a managing member of an investment company, Aberon Capital Management, was charged with conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, securities fraud, wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. Prosecutors alleged that Jain provided false representations to two investors in a fund controlled by Aberon regarding the fund’s performance.
Late last year, Jain pled guilty to one count of obstruction of justice pursuant to a plea agreement with federal prosecutors. However, New York District Judge P. Kevin Castel declined to follow the recommendation of the U.S. probation office and sentence Jain to time served. Instead, he sentenced Jain to three months in prison, along with a fine of $15,000 and one year of supervised release. Judge Castel seemingly agreed with prosecutors who argued it was important to “send a message to people in the financial industry” that the only way financial professionals can fulfill their obligations to regulators “is for witnesses to tell the truth.” According to Judge Castel, “It becomes in this case important to deliver the message that the crime is deserving of meaningful punishment.”
When an SEC Investigation Can Lead to Jail Time
The Jain case provides valuable lessons for firms and individuals under the SEC’s purview. Of the utmost importance, lying to investigators is the quickest way for the situation to go from bad to worse.
When the SEC launches an investigation, it first develops the facts to the fullest extent possible through informal inquiry, interviewing witnesses, examining brokerage records, reviewing trading data, and other methods. Once armed with a formal order of investigation, the staff of the SEC’s Enforcement Division can compel witnesses by subpoena to testify and produce books, records, and other relevant documents.
Being the target of a SEC investigation can be extremely stressful, even if you’re fairly confident that you haven’t done anything wrong. To avoid unintended criminal liability, it is imperative to be truthful and cooperate with investigators. Of course, that doesn’t mean that you should not aggressively seek to protect your legal rights.
In the case above, the defendant ultimately faced criminal liability not for securities fraud, but lying to investigators. When confronted with a SEC investigation (or even an examination), there are steps you can take to help ensure a more favorable outcome:
Resist temptation: Firms may be tempted to be less than forthcoming, particularly if they suspect that SEC investigators may find something they don’t like. However, this will only lead to greater problems. Do not destroy your documents and don’t delete your emails.
Involve legal counsel: Make sure your attorneys have experience and expertise in dealing with government investigations specifically by this agency.
Document the process: Firms should keep track of all documents provided to the SEC using a list or spreadsheet.
Monitor interaction: It is imperative to make sure that anyone speaking with the SEC is open and honest with the information that they provide. To stay on top of the situation, it is often a good idea to de-brief employees who speak with examiners.
Following an investigation, SEC staff present their findings to the Commission for its review. The Commission can authorize the staff to file a case in federal court or bring an administrative action. Enforcement can also refer potential criminal cases to criminal law enforcement authorities for investigation or coordinate SEC investigations with criminal investigations involving the same conduct. While the SEC can‘t by itself impose criminal sanctions, if a person is convicted of a criminal violation of the securities laws, a court may sentence that person to serve time in jail.
In some cases, the targets of an SEC investigation can reach a settlement with SEC enforcement officials or a plea agreement with federal prosecutors. While this will be greatly influenced by the facts of the case, how targets of an investigation (or a witness) conduct themselves during the investigation can often play a role in the result of the matter.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further, please contact Dan Brecher or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
