Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 7, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
On April 16, 2015, the NYC City Council passed the law that will prohibit pre-employment credit checks, “Stop Credit Discrimination in Employment Act”. The new law will become effective 120 days after being signed into law by Mayor Bill de Blasio.
The anti pre-employment credit checks law, which applies to businesses with four or more employees, would amend the New York City’s Human Rights Law to make it an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to use an individual’s consumer credit history in making employment decisions. As with other violations of the law, workers would be able to pursue a private cause of action.
The broad employment law defines “consumer credit history” as “information bearing on an individual’s credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity, including, but not limited to, an individual’s credit score, credit account and other consumer account balances, and payment history.” Information about prior bankruptcies, judgments, or liens and details regarding the number of credit accounts, late or missed payments, charged-off debts, items in collections, credit limit or prior credit report inquiries is also off limits.
In addition to banning the use of consumer credit histories in the hiring process, the law also makes it illegal to consider such information when making decisions regarding “compensation, or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment.”
The NYC employment law does include several notable exceptions from pre-employment credit checks , which were added to the law in its final stages. For instance, it does not apply to employers required by state or federal law or regulation, or by a self-regulatory organization, to use consumer credit history for employment purposes.
In addition, the following are also exempted from pre-employment credit checks :
The Stop Credit Discrimination in Employment Act reflects the growing trend of restricting the use of consumer credit checks to screen potential job candidates. California, Maryland, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Colorado and Nevada already have similar measures in place. Accordingly, it is imperative for employers to review their policies and procedures to maintain compliance in this rapidly evolving legal landscape.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jorge R. de Armas or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!