Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 27, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New York City Council recently passed several measures intended it to make it easier for mothers to express breast milk during the workday. Most notably, the bills require New York City employers to provide designated lactation rooms and establish a workplace lactation accommodation policy regarding the use of such rooms.

Existing federal and state laws already address these issues. Under Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers must provide reasonable break times for workers to express breast milk for up to one year following a child’s birth. Employers are also required to provide a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public, for the employee to express breast milk.
Employers with fewer than 50 employees are not subject to the FLSA breastfeeding requirements. However, the federal law does not preempt State and local governments from providing greater protections to employees. New Jersey already imposes such requirements on employers. Amendments to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) further provide that it is a civil rights violation for a working woman to be fired or otherwise discriminated against because of breastfeeding or expressing her milk during breaks.
New York was the first state in the nation to pass a civil rights law that protects a mother’s right to breastfeed in public. New York’s labor law also grants rights to breastfeeding mothers. Current New York law requires employers to provide reasonable, unpaid break times or permits employees to use paid break or meal times to express breast milk for up to three years from the birth of the child. Employers must make reasonable efforts to provide a room or other location, in close proximity to the work area, where an employee can express milk in privacy.
The New York City Council recently passed legislation imposing additional obligations on New York City employers. Under Intro. 879-A, employers with 15 or more employees must provide lactation rooms, as well as refrigerators, in reasonable proximity to work areas for the purposes of expressing and storing breast milk. Under the bill, the term “lactation room” means a sanitary place, other than a restroom, that can be used to express breast milk, shielded from view and free from intrusion, and that includes at minimum an electrical outlet, a chair, a surface on which to place a breast pump and other personal items, and nearby access to running water.
Intro. 879-A further provides that if the room designated by the employer to serve as a lactation room is also used for another purpose, the sole function of the room must be as a lactation room while an employee is using it to express breast milk. In addition, if providing a lactation room poses an undue hardship on the employer, the employer must engage in a “cooperative dialogue” with the employee regarding other options that may be available.
The second bill, Intro. 905-A, requires employers to implement a Lactation Room Accommodation Policy, which must be distributed to all employees upon hiring. The policy must include a statement that employees have a right to request a lactation room and identify a process by which employees may request a lactation room. Under the bill, this process must:
Intro. 905-A also directs the City Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) to establish and make available a model lactation accommodation policy for employers to use.
If signed by Mayor Bill DiBlasio, the bills would take effect 120 days from the date of the mayor’s signature. Given the likelihood that the new requirements will become law, NYC employers should begin considering their compliance obligations, such as where to locate a lactation room. For compliance concerns, we encourage you to contact a member of the Labor & Employment Law Group at Scarinci Hollenbeck.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!