Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

NJ “Ban the Box” Bill Headed to Gov. Christie’s Desk

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 22, 2014

Key Contacts

Back

New Jersey may soon be the latest state to “ban the box.” Late last month, the state legislature passed the Opportunity to Compete Act, which would restrict the use of criminal background checks by New Jersey employers. The bill now awaits Gov. Chris Christie’s signature.

ban-the-box-chris-christie-001

Six states—Hawaii, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota and New Mexico—have previously passed measures to remove barriers to employment for individuals with criminal records by restricting the use of criminal background checks by employers. These laws “ban the box” by eliminating the check box on many employment applications that requires applicants to disclose whether they have a criminal conviction in their background.

Under the proposed New Jersey employment law, employers would be prohibited from making certain inquiries into an applicant’s criminal background during the early stages of the hiring process. They would also be precluded from publishing an advertisement soliciting candidates for employment that states that the employer will not consider a candidate who has been arrested for or convicted of a crime or offense. However, the bill headed to Gov. Christie’s desk is more employer-friendly that the initial measure proposed in December 2013.

Amendments to the bill allow an employer to make inquiries regarding a job applicant’s criminal record after the conclusion of the initial application process, which is defined as ending when the employer has conducted a first interview of the applicant. The initial version permitted the employer to make those inquiries only after selecting the applicant as the employer’s first choice to fill the position.

The amendments also eliminate all restrictions on what types of criminal background information employers can seek, and rely upon, once the initial application process ends, including information about offenses which occurred longer ago than specified periods of time, information about minor nonviolent offenses and information about arrests or accusations without convictions. However, records that have been expunged or erased through executive pardon may still not be considered.

Employers are also no longer required to consider, and “discuss in good faith with an applicant,” information regarding the accuracy of criminal record information, the degree of rehabilitation or good conduct of the applicant, the nature of the offense and how long ago it occurred, the duties and setting of the job, and other information provided by the applicant.

As in the initial proposal, employers who violate the law are subject to a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for the first violation, $5,000 for the second violation, and $10,000 for each subsequent violation. There is still no private cause of action for aggrieved applicants.

We will be closely tracking the status of the bill and will provide updates when they become available.

If you have any questions about the proposed ban the box legislation or would like to discuss your company’s hiring practices, please contact me, Ramon Rivera, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment attorney with whom you work. 

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know post image

SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know

Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know"
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses post image

Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses

Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses"
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress post image

Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress

The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress"
Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them post image

Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them

Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!