
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: April 7, 2021

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, social media is an increasingly common means of communication. While sites like Twitter and Facebook can help us stay connected to friends and keep up with current events, social media platforms can also be used to spread misinformation and conduct outright fraud. Accordingly, investors should be wary when using information from social media to inform their investment decisions.
According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), it has experienced a significant uptick in tips, complaints, and referrals involving investment scams in recent months. Social media is an attractive medium for fraudsters because they can reach large numbers of people with minimum effort and at a relatively low cost.
Earlier this month, the SEC brought fraud charges against a California-based trader who used social media to spread false information about a defunct company, while secretly profiting by selling stock he owned in the company. According to the SEC’s complaint, Andrew Fassari published numerous false and misleading posts on social media platforms about Arcis Resources Corporation (ARCS), a publicly-traded company that has been defunct since at least 2016. At the same time, he was covertly trading the securities of ARCS in violation of federal securities laws.
The SEC alleges that Fassari purchased tens of millions of shares of ARCS, then deceptively spread false information about the company’s purportedly revived operations and imminent positive announcements on Twitter, among other social media platforms. Fassari uses the Twitter “handle” @OCMillionaire and uses similar usernames on other social media sites. The @OCMillionaire profile joined Twitter in July 2013, lists “13.1K” followers, includes a picture of a black Ferrari, and states, in part: “Master short squeeze artist. #Pennystock Wizard.”
The SEC’s complaint further alleges that, between December 9 and 21, 2020, Fassari made approximately 120 tweets that referenced “$ARCS,” dozens of which were false and misleading. For example, he tweeted, “$ARCS 380,000 indoor cultivation 1 Million+ sq ft processing. WEEEEEEEEE This CEO has big plans for us” and “a ton of news coming and backed by huge investors for its #cannabis operation[.]” Over the next several days, ARCS’s share price skyrocketed, ultimately increasing over 4,000%. On December 10, 14, and 16, 2020, Fassari sold all of his shares in ARCS for profits over $929,000, all while continuing to publish false and misleading information about ARCS and about his trading in ARCS.
The SEC’s complaint charges Fassari with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty from Fassari. The SEC also issued an order temporarily suspending trading in the securities of ARCS.
“We allege that Fassari profited by using social media to deceive investors,” Melissa R. Hodgman, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a press statement. “The SEC is committed to protecting investors by proactively monitoring suspicious trading activity tied to social media, and by charging those who use social media to violate the federal securities laws.”
The SEC’s latest enforcement action represents just one form of social media investment fraud. According to the SEC, fraudsters will commonly use social media to spread stock rumors and manipulate the market to their advantage. In other cases, scammers will impersonate an established source of market information by setting up an account name, profile, or handle designed to spoof a particular company or securities research firm. They may even use the company’s logo, website information, or employee names to make the social media account appear legitimate.
To avoid falling victim to fraud, it is imperative to always identify the true source of the investment information in your news feed. Below are several specific red flags to watch out for:
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Dan Brecher or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!