
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: April 7, 2021

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, social media is an increasingly common means of communication. While sites like Twitter and Facebook can help us stay connected to friends and keep up with current events, social media platforms can also be used to spread misinformation and conduct outright fraud. Accordingly, investors should be wary when using information from social media to inform their investment decisions.
According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), it has experienced a significant uptick in tips, complaints, and referrals involving investment scams in recent months. Social media is an attractive medium for fraudsters because they can reach large numbers of people with minimum effort and at a relatively low cost.
Earlier this month, the SEC brought fraud charges against a California-based trader who used social media to spread false information about a defunct company, while secretly profiting by selling stock he owned in the company. According to the SEC’s complaint, Andrew Fassari published numerous false and misleading posts on social media platforms about Arcis Resources Corporation (ARCS), a publicly-traded company that has been defunct since at least 2016. At the same time, he was covertly trading the securities of ARCS in violation of federal securities laws.
The SEC alleges that Fassari purchased tens of millions of shares of ARCS, then deceptively spread false information about the company’s purportedly revived operations and imminent positive announcements on Twitter, among other social media platforms. Fassari uses the Twitter “handle” @OCMillionaire and uses similar usernames on other social media sites. The @OCMillionaire profile joined Twitter in July 2013, lists “13.1K” followers, includes a picture of a black Ferrari, and states, in part: “Master short squeeze artist. #Pennystock Wizard.”
The SEC’s complaint further alleges that, between December 9 and 21, 2020, Fassari made approximately 120 tweets that referenced “$ARCS,” dozens of which were false and misleading. For example, he tweeted, “$ARCS 380,000 indoor cultivation 1 Million+ sq ft processing. WEEEEEEEEE This CEO has big plans for us” and “a ton of news coming and backed by huge investors for its #cannabis operation[.]” Over the next several days, ARCS’s share price skyrocketed, ultimately increasing over 4,000%. On December 10, 14, and 16, 2020, Fassari sold all of his shares in ARCS for profits over $929,000, all while continuing to publish false and misleading information about ARCS and about his trading in ARCS.
The SEC’s complaint charges Fassari with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty from Fassari. The SEC also issued an order temporarily suspending trading in the securities of ARCS.
“We allege that Fassari profited by using social media to deceive investors,” Melissa R. Hodgman, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a press statement. “The SEC is committed to protecting investors by proactively monitoring suspicious trading activity tied to social media, and by charging those who use social media to violate the federal securities laws.”
The SEC’s latest enforcement action represents just one form of social media investment fraud. According to the SEC, fraudsters will commonly use social media to spread stock rumors and manipulate the market to their advantage. In other cases, scammers will impersonate an established source of market information by setting up an account name, profile, or handle designed to spoof a particular company or securities research firm. They may even use the company’s logo, website information, or employee names to make the social media account appear legitimate.
To avoid falling victim to fraud, it is imperative to always identify the true source of the investment information in your news feed. Below are several specific red flags to watch out for:
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues further,
please contact Dan Brecher or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The application of traditional federal securities laws to crypto assets continues to evolve. In some cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers tokens and other digital assets to be securities. This makes them subject to federal securities law, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This classification has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano

Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!