
Donald Scarinci
Firm Managing Partner
201-896-4100 dscarinci@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Donald Scarinci
Date: January 12, 2015

Firm Managing Partner
201-896-4100 dscarinci@sh-law.comChina represents significant opportunities for U.S. corporations, with exports alone totaling $161 billion in 2013. However, the country’s legal unpredictability increases the risks of conducting business in terms of international law.
To improve trade relations, officials from China and the United States recently concluded the 25th session of the U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT). The JCCT meets annually to review the progress made by 16 working groups that meet throughout the year to address diverse trade issues, from intellectual property rights to the environment.
“This year we sought to ‘reimagine’ the JCCT to engage businesses from both countries in a dialogue about how to strengthen the trade and investment relationship between the world’s two largest economies, and we made significant progress,” said U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker.
Among the most noteworthy agreements, China has pledged to modify its enforcement of its Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) to treat domestic and foreign companies equally. The law is intended to deter monopoly agreements, prevent abuse of dominant market position, and police other transactions that may restrict competition. However, multi-national corporations operating in China have raised serious concerns about insufficient predictability, fairness and transparency in China’s investigative processes since the law’s enactment in 2008.
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce alleged that China’s enforcement of the anti-competition law in favor of local companies “arguably violates commitments that China undertook when it acceded to the World Trade Organization.” Last year alone, Audi, BMW, Daimler, Microsoft, and Qualcomm were all investigated for violating the AML.
the Chinese delegation agreed that a foreign company in an Anti-Monopoly Law investigation would be permitted to have counsel present and to consult with the company during proceedings. China also made several additional commitments, such as agreeing to provide increased transparency for investigated companies.
the agreed upon changes should lead to greater predictability and increased economic opportunities when operating in China. We will be closely tracking the status of the JCCT commitments and will provide updates in the coming months.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!