As of January 2, 2021, trademark fees have officially increased…
Trademark fees have increased, effective January 2, 2021. This is the first time that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased fees in nearly three years.
According to the USPTO, the higher fees will enable it to “continue to enhance the quality of trademark examination, achieve optimal examination times, invest in modernizing trademark information technology systems and infrastructure, and provide stability to USPTO operations, even in times of financial fluctuations.”
Trademark Fee Changes Effective in 2021
On November 17, 2020, the USPTO issued a Final Rule to set or increase certain trademark fees, as authorized under the America Invents Act (AIA). The USPTO’s full list of fee changes and the rationale behind them are set forth in the Final Rule. Below is a brief summary of the fee changes:
Application and application-related fees
TEAS Standard: $350 per class Up from $275 per class
TEAS Plus: $250 per class Up from $225 per class
Post registration fees
Section 8 or 71 declaration filed through TEAS: $225 per class Up from $125 per class
New fee for deleting goods, services, and/or classes from a registration after submitting a Section 8 or 71 Declaration, but before the declaration is accepted: $250 per class if filed through TEAS
Petition to the Director and letter of protest fees
Petition to the Director filed through TEAS: $250 Up from $100
Petition to revive an abandoned application filed through TEAS: $150 Up from $100
New fee for letter of protest: $50 per application
TTAB fees
Petition to cancel filed through Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals ( ESTTA): $600 per class Up from $400 per class
Notice of opposition filed through ESTTA: $600 per class Up from $400 per class
Initial 90-day extension requests for filing a notice of opposition, or second 60-day extension requests for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA: $200 per application Up from $100 per application
There is still no fee for a first 30-day extension request for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA.
Final 60-day extension request for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA: $400 per application Up from $200 per application
Ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $225 per class Up from $200 per class
New fee for second, and subsequent, requests for an extension of time to file an appeal brief in an ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $100 per application
There is still no fee for a first request.
New fee for appeal briefs in an ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $200 per class
New fee for requests for oral hearings: $500 per proceeding
The USPTO is also implementing partial refunds for petitions to cancel in default judgments if the cancellation involves only a nonuse or abandonment claim, the defendant didn’t appear, and there were no filings other than the petition to cancel.
New Fee for Requests to Delete Goods/Services
As set forth above, the USPTO is imposing a new fee if a request to delete goods, services, or classes from a registration is filed after a Section 8 or Section 71 Declaration is filed but before it’s accepted. No fee will be charged if the request is filed before a Section 8 or Section 71 Declaration is filed. According to the USPTO, charging a fee for deletions made between the filing and acceptance of the Section 8 or Section 71 Declaration will improve the integrity of the register by encouraging registrants to:
Determine sooner the goods, services, or classes in the registration for which their registered trademark is no longer in use.
Delete those goods, services, or classes from the registration before filing or within their Section 8 or 71 Declaration.
More quickly comply with statutory requirements regarding claims of use.
Key Takeaway
Some of the USPTO trademark fee hikes are significant, particularly when an application covers multiple classes. The broad increases will also impact both the registration and enforcement of trademarks.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
