Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 19, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTrademark owners and applicants are the target of ongoing scams, including emails that misleadingly suggest certain fees must be paid through the soliciting company. To increase awareness, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued another warning regarding fraudulent trademark solicitations that appear to be official correspondence.

Trademark applicants and owners routinely receive correspondence from the USPTO for legitimate purposes concerning legitimate deadlines and fees. However, they also receive emails from private companies that attempt to profit from the applicants/owners. To avoid being scammed, it is important to know the difference.
As the USPTO notes in its latest warning, private companies often use trademark application and registration information from USPTO databases to mail or email solicitations to trademark applicants and registrants. While the information contained in these solicitations may be accurate (for example, that a certain filing is due to keep a registration active), using these private services is never a requirement of trademark registration.
While some services may be legitimate (i.e. assistance in responding to an office action issued against an application), many others are not, including offering to record trademarks in a “private” registry separate from the USPTO. Some solicitations also purport to be official USPTO correspondence when they are not. As the USPTO warns:
All official correspondence about your trademark application or registration will be from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Don’t be fooled by company names that sound like government agencies or offers that contain government data. Some company names may include terms like “United States,” “U.S.,” “Trademark,” “Patent,” “Registration,” “Office,” or “Agency.” Some offers and notices may include official government data publicly available from USPTO records, or refer to other government agencies and sections of the U.S. Code.
The USPTO frequently posts warnings on its website with specific details of the scams. At last count, the agency listed nearly 50 different fraudulent trademark solicitations. The agency also recently posted a video to help trademark registrants learn about potentially misleading trademark offers and notices, the types of services they offer, and how to detect them.
The scams continue to proliferate because the USPTO can do little to stop them. As the USPTO emphasizes, it is not an enforcement agency. “We don’t have the legal authority to stop private companies from sending trademark-related offers and notices, nor can we sue or prosecute entities that defraud or attempt to defraud our applicants and registrants,” the agency states on its website. “However, we can raise awareness and work closely with the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the United States Postal Inspection Service to combat the problem.”
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can take action, but typically only does so after receiving numerous complaints about the same company. For this reason, if you receive a fraudulent trademark solicitation, it is important to notify the FTC by filing a consumer complaint.
To avoid falling victim to a fraudulent trademark scam, businesses should always read the “fine print” carefully. If you have concerns about a pending trademark registration, application, or upcoming renewal deadline, you can consult an experienced intellectual property attorney. It is also advisable to verify the legitimacy of any trademark solicitation before enrolling in these services or sending any money.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!