Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 19, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTrademark owners and applicants are the target of ongoing scams, including emails that misleadingly suggest certain fees must be paid through the soliciting company. To increase awareness, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued another warning regarding fraudulent trademark solicitations that appear to be official correspondence.
Trademark applicants and owners routinely receive correspondence from the USPTO for legitimate purposes concerning legitimate deadlines and fees. However, they also receive emails from private companies that attempt to profit from the applicants/owners. To avoid being scammed, it is important to know the difference.
As the USPTO notes in its latest warning, private companies often use trademark application and registration information from USPTO databases to mail or email solicitations to trademark applicants and registrants. While the information contained in these solicitations may be accurate (for example, that a certain filing is due to keep a registration active), using these private services is never a requirement of trademark registration.
While some services may be legitimate (i.e. assistance in responding to an office action issued against an application), many others are not, including offering to record trademarks in a “private” registry separate from the USPTO. Some solicitations also purport to be official USPTO correspondence when they are not. As the USPTO warns:
All official correspondence about your trademark application or registration will be from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Don’t be fooled by company names that sound like government agencies or offers that contain government data. Some company names may include terms like “United States,” “U.S.,” “Trademark,” “Patent,” “Registration,” “Office,” or “Agency.” Some offers and notices may include official government data publicly available from USPTO records, or refer to other government agencies and sections of the U.S. Code.
The USPTO frequently posts warnings on its website with specific details of the scams. At last count, the agency listed nearly 50 different fraudulent trademark solicitations. The agency also recently posted a video to help trademark registrants learn about potentially misleading trademark offers and notices, the types of services they offer, and how to detect them.
The scams continue to proliferate because the USPTO can do little to stop them. As the USPTO emphasizes, it is not an enforcement agency. “We don’t have the legal authority to stop private companies from sending trademark-related offers and notices, nor can we sue or prosecute entities that defraud or attempt to defraud our applicants and registrants,” the agency states on its website. “However, we can raise awareness and work closely with the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the United States Postal Inspection Service to combat the problem.”
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can take action, but typically only does so after receiving numerous complaints about the same company. For this reason, if you receive a fraudulent trademark solicitation, it is important to notify the FTC by filing a consumer complaint.
To avoid falling victim to a fraudulent trademark scam, businesses should always read the “fine print” carefully. If you have concerns about a pending trademark registration, application, or upcoming renewal deadline, you can consult an experienced intellectual property attorney. It is also advisable to verify the legitimacy of any trademark solicitation before enrolling in these services or sending any money.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!