
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: October 8, 2014
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe U.S. Supreme Court decided that inherited Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) do not qualify as retirement funds and are not exempt from claims of creditors under the Bankruptcy Code §522(b)(3)(C). The Supreme Court resorted to the plain meaning of the words and held that retirement funds are sums of money set aside for an individual when he or she stops working. Under that view, IRAs may be divided into two types, ordinary and inherited. An ordinary IRA is exempt up to $1,245,475 and has a cost-of-living adjustment. There are additional exceptions for SEPs or SIMPLE IRAs which are not subject to the limitation. Rollovers from an ERISA qualified plans into an IRA are not counted toward the exemption limit.
IRAs passing to spouses and children had been considered retirement funds, safe from bankruptcy, claims before the 2014 Supreme Court decision in Clark v. Rameker. The decision requires one to look at the Bankruptcy Rules that may apply. A debtor in Bankruptcy may choose between the exemptions offered by the Bankruptcy Code or those offered by the state of the debtor’s residence. Certain states, such as Alaska, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Florida, adopted state law exemptions that protect IRAs. Wisconsin, the state of residence for the Clarks, adopted the federal exemptions, so there was no choice. Clearly, state law makes a difference.
New Jersey law exempts assets held or maintained in a “qualifying trust” and broadly defines the term to include trusts holding retirement plans, 529 plans and IRAs to name some. Why, you ask, are we concerned if we live in New Jersey?
I estimate that about only one-half of adult children, identified in our recent estate plans, reside in New Jersey. If a child is named as beneficiary of an IRA, it is the law of the child’s state of residence that will control the outcome. No one can predict where a child may reside or what state law might be in the future. The solution offered by some is the “Trustee IRA.” We must consider a beneficiary’s potential future creditors if an estate plan is to effectively transfer wealth to the intended beneficiaries.
The trust; however, cannot be a conduit trust. The trust must have the ability to accumulate income. Accumulation trusts for IRAs were not well received because trust income tax rates are higher than individual rates and because Minimum Required Distributions (MRD) for a group of beneficiaries were calculated using the life expectancy of the oldest living beneficiary. MRD rule discouraged the use of one accumulation trust for a group of beneficiaries of varying ages. Clients are not fond of the increased costs for separate accumulation trusts and portfolio management is inefficient.
State trust law also impacts asset protection. In Tannen v. Tannen, a New Jersey divorce case, I described the impact between different versions of the Uniform Trust Code upon the ability of a beneficiary or a creditor of the beneficiary to demand distribution that a trustee with discretionary authority distribute funds. This may necessitate flight or situs clauses that sacrifice efficiency for asset protection.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The U.S. Supreme Court decided that inherited Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) do not qualify as retirement funds and are not exempt from claims of creditors under the Bankruptcy Code §522(b)(3)(C). The Supreme Court resorted to the plain meaning of the words and held that retirement funds are sums of money set aside for an individual when he or she stops working. Under that view, IRAs may be divided into two types, ordinary and inherited. An ordinary IRA is exempt up to $1,245,475 and has a cost-of-living adjustment. There are additional exceptions for SEPs or SIMPLE IRAs which are not subject to the limitation. Rollovers from an ERISA qualified plans into an IRA are not counted toward the exemption limit.
IRAs passing to spouses and children had been considered retirement funds, safe from bankruptcy, claims before the 2014 Supreme Court decision in Clark v. Rameker. The decision requires one to look at the Bankruptcy Rules that may apply. A debtor in Bankruptcy may choose between the exemptions offered by the Bankruptcy Code or those offered by the state of the debtor’s residence. Certain states, such as Alaska, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Florida, adopted state law exemptions that protect IRAs. Wisconsin, the state of residence for the Clarks, adopted the federal exemptions, so there was no choice. Clearly, state law makes a difference.
New Jersey law exempts assets held or maintained in a “qualifying trust” and broadly defines the term to include trusts holding retirement plans, 529 plans and IRAs to name some. Why, you ask, are we concerned if we live in New Jersey?
I estimate that about only one-half of adult children, identified in our recent estate plans, reside in New Jersey. If a child is named as beneficiary of an IRA, it is the law of the child’s state of residence that will control the outcome. No one can predict where a child may reside or what state law might be in the future. The solution offered by some is the “Trustee IRA.” We must consider a beneficiary’s potential future creditors if an estate plan is to effectively transfer wealth to the intended beneficiaries.
The trust; however, cannot be a conduit trust. The trust must have the ability to accumulate income. Accumulation trusts for IRAs were not well received because trust income tax rates are higher than individual rates and because Minimum Required Distributions (MRD) for a group of beneficiaries were calculated using the life expectancy of the oldest living beneficiary. MRD rule discouraged the use of one accumulation trust for a group of beneficiaries of varying ages. Clients are not fond of the increased costs for separate accumulation trusts and portfolio management is inefficient.
State trust law also impacts asset protection. In Tannen v. Tannen, a New Jersey divorce case, I described the impact between different versions of the Uniform Trust Code upon the ability of a beneficiary or a creditor of the beneficiary to demand distribution that a trustee with discretionary authority distribute funds. This may necessitate flight or situs clauses that sacrifice efficiency for asset protection.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!