Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 29, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
While improving the country’s highways, bridges, railways, and broadband networks has broad bipartisan support, the devil is in the details. The Biden Administration must work with Republicans to reach a consensus on how much money to spend, what programs qualify as “infrastructure,” and whether to raise taxes to pay for it.
When running from President, Biden called for a massive overhaul of the country’s infrastructure. His plan centered on modernizing infrastructure, increasing reliance on clean energy, while also creating jobs and using infrastructure investments to address racial disparities. At the time, Biden estimated that his clean energy infrastructure plan would cost $2 trillion over four years.
Below are several infrastructure initiatives President Biden outlined while campaigning:
Republicans, along with several business industry groups, have stated that they are willing to work with the Biden Administration to pass infrastructure spending of at least $1 trillion. Areas of agreement include funds for bridges, highways, rural broadband networks, and water/sewer systems. However, including broad climate change measures or unpaid leave is likely a more uphill battle.
While Republicans and Democrats may agree that the country’s infrastructure needs upgrades, legislation to make that happen will be subject to the same political divides that impact any other bill. The biggest hurdle is whether or not to raise taxes to fund infrastructure spending. Republicans have already pushed back at the prospect of tax hikes. Business groups are lobbying for alternatives to tax increases, such as private-public partnerships. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has also proposed temporarily raising the gas tax as one way to pay for the infrastructure overhaul.
If the parties can’t reach a consensus, Democrats could seek to pass an infrastructure bill without any Republican support. The process of reconciliation allows for Democrats to pass legislation with a bare majority in the evenly divided Senate, without having to obtain the typical 60-vote supermajority required for bills. Vice President Kamala Harris’s vote would then break the tie and allow passage of the bill.
Reconciliation is intended to allow for expedited consideration of certain tax, spending, and debt-limit legislation. Reconciliation starts with the congressional budget resolution. If the budget calls for reconciliation, it tells certain committees to change spending, revenues, or deficits by specific amounts. Each committee writes a bill to achieve its target, and if more than one committee is told to act, the Budget Committee puts the bills together into one big bill.
The budget reconciliation process put bills on the fast-track. They can’t be halted by a filibuster, Senate debate time is limited, and only certain kinds of amendments can be offered. However, reconciliation is limited to certain circumstances — only policies that change spending or revenues can be included.
Now that the COVID-19 stimulus bill is done, the Biden Administration has turned its attention to infrastructure. While President Biden has not yet unveiled his plan to fund an infrastructure bill, the White House and Department of Transportation officials have begun discussions with business leaders and Republicans. While not confirmed, Memorial Day has been floated as the date when President Biden would submit his proposal to Congress. He is expected to preview the plan in April when he addresses a joint session of Congress. While there is no set deadline to pass an infrastructure package, the five-year Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), which funds highway and transportation programs, expires September 30, 2021.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!