The Anatomy of an FTC Data Breach Investigation – How does the Commission operate?
While we all await national data breach standards, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has made it clear that it plans to continue to assert its consumer protection authority and bring privacy and data security enforcement actions. In a recent blog post, Mark Eichorn, an Assistant Director in the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection’s Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, outlined how the FTC typically investigates a potential data breach.
When launching a data breach investigation, the agency relies on Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” The statute broadly defines unfair practices as those that “cause or [are] likely to cause substantial injury to consumers…not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves and not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.”
While the FTC may first initiate an informal investigation, it also has the power to subpoena corporate documents and testimony, such as security risk assessments, privacy policies, and training protocols. According to the FTC, its goal is to determine the circumstances surrounding the breach: what happened, what protections were in place at the time, and how the company responded. It then uses that information to determine whether to bring an enforcement action.
According to the FTC, it often decides to launch an investigation based on news reports, complaints from consumers or other companies, or requests from Congress or other government agencies. In the absence of a legal obligation to notify regulators of a data breach, companies must decide whether to self-report the issue to federal or state authorities. In its blog post, the FTC makes it clear that it favors companies that alert state or federal authorities when breaches occur rather than waiting for the FTC to come knocking.
As Eichorn writes:
We’ll also consider the steps the company took to help affected consumers, and whether it cooperated with criminal and other law enforcement agencies in their efforts to apprehend the people responsible for the intrusion. In our eyes, a company that has reported a breach to the appropriate law enforcers and cooperated with them has taken an important step to reduce the harm from the breach. Therefore, in the course of conducting an investigation, it’s likely we’d view that company more favorably than a company that hasn’t cooperated.
Of course, no good deed goes unpunished, and self-reporting can also backfire. While the company may think that they took all of the appropriate steps to address a data breach, the FTC’s investigation may conclude otherwise and impose unexpected fines and penalties. Accordingly, all legal decisions in the wake of a potential data breach should be made in consultation with experienced counsel.
###
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo.
Follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo and @eWHW_Blog for timely comments on related issues. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your legal needs, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide (http://ewhwblog.com)
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Anatomy of an FTC Data Breach Investigation
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Anatomy of an FTC Data Breach Investigation – How does the Commission operate?
While we all await national data breach standards, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has made it clear that it plans to continue to assert its consumer protection authority and bring privacy and data security enforcement actions. In a recent blog post, Mark Eichorn, an Assistant Director in the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection’s Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, outlined how the FTC typically investigates a potential data breach.
When launching a data breach investigation, the agency relies on Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” The statute broadly defines unfair practices as those that “cause or [are] likely to cause substantial injury to consumers…not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves and not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.”
While the FTC may first initiate an informal investigation, it also has the power to subpoena corporate documents and testimony, such as security risk assessments, privacy policies, and training protocols. According to the FTC, its goal is to determine the circumstances surrounding the breach: what happened, what protections were in place at the time, and how the company responded. It then uses that information to determine whether to bring an enforcement action.
According to the FTC, it often decides to launch an investigation based on news reports, complaints from consumers or other companies, or requests from Congress or other government agencies. In the absence of a legal obligation to notify regulators of a data breach, companies must decide whether to self-report the issue to federal or state authorities. In its blog post, the FTC makes it clear that it favors companies that alert state or federal authorities when breaches occur rather than waiting for the FTC to come knocking.
As Eichorn writes:
We’ll also consider the steps the company took to help affected consumers, and whether it cooperated with criminal and other law enforcement agencies in their efforts to apprehend the people responsible for the intrusion. In our eyes, a company that has reported a breach to the appropriate law enforcers and cooperated with them has taken an important step to reduce the harm from the breach. Therefore, in the course of conducting an investigation, it’s likely we’d view that company more favorably than a company that hasn’t cooperated.
Of course, no good deed goes unpunished, and self-reporting can also backfire. While the company may think that they took all of the appropriate steps to address a data breach, the FTC’s investigation may conclude otherwise and impose unexpected fines and penalties. Accordingly, all legal decisions in the wake of a potential data breach should be made in consultation with experienced counsel.
###
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo.
Follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo and @eWHW_Blog for timely comments on related issues. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your legal needs, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide (http://ewhwblog.com)
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
