
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comBrokers and advisers increasingly rely on social media to connect with current and potential clients. After all, don’t we all prefer to read a 140-character Tweet promoting a new investment opportunity instead of digesting a 20-page prospectus filled with boilerplate and legalese?

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has previously issued social media guidance regarding how investment firms can take advantage of social media without running afoul of their compliance obligations. However, the existing guidance surrounding the use of social media has largely failed to keep pace with the popularity of social media, leaving a lot of “gray” areas and opportunities for compliance missteps.
In response, FINRA recently released a Regulatory Notice entitled, Social Media and Digital Communications: Guidance on Social Networking Websites and Business Communications. The guidance addresses the application of FINRA Rule 2210 to social media through a series of questions and answers.
FINRA Rule 2210, which governs communications to the public, requires that broker-dealers’ communications are fair and balanced and do not omit material information that would cause them to be misleading. FINRA previously addressed how the rule applies to posts to social media sites and other digital communications. In addition to recordkeeping obligations, FINRA has provided guidance on third-party social media posts and hyperlinks to third-party websites.
In Regulatory Notices 10-06 and 11-39, FINRA advised firms that they are obligated to retain records of digital communications that relate to their “business as such” and that determining whether a communication must be retained depends on its content and not upon the type of device or technology used to transmit the communication.
Regulatory Notice 10-06 that, as a general matter, posts by customers or other third parties on social media sites established by a firm or its personnel do not constitute communications with the public by the firm or its associated persons under Rule 2210. Exceptions include if the firm or an associated person has (1) paid for or been involved in the preparation of the content (referred to as “entanglement”) or (2) explicitly or implicitly endorsed or approved the content (referred to as “adoption”).
Regulatory Notice 11-39 advised that a member may not establish a link to any third-party site that the firm knows or has reason to know contains false or misleading content and may not include a link on its website if there are any red flags that indicate the linked site contains false or misleading content. It further stated firms can be liable under FINRA rules for content on a linked third-party site if the firm has adopted or has become entangled with its content.
In April, FINRA offered additional guidance, citing the proliferation of social media as well as requests from the industry for greater clarity on certain issues. The guidance consists of 12 questions and answers, with topic ranging from testimonials to native advertising. Below are several highlights:
Social media is a frequent area of concern during FINRA exams. FINRA has also conducted targeted social media “sweeps” in the past. Accordingly, member firms should thoroughly review the entire posting and discuss any compliance concerns with experienced counsel. Therefore, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!