Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

FINRA Publishes New Social Media Guidance

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: May 24, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

To Keep Pace with the Increasing Popularity of Social Media, FINRA Publishes New Social Media Guidance

Brokers and advisers increasingly rely on social media to connect with current and potential clients. After all, don’t we all prefer to read a 140-character Tweet promoting a new investment opportunity instead of digesting a 20-page prospectus filled with boilerplate and legalese?

FINRA Publishes New Social Media Guidance
Photo courtesy of Stocksnap.io

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has previously issued social media guidance regarding how investment firms can take advantage of social media without running afoul of their compliance obligations. However, the existing guidance surrounding the use of social media has largely failed to keep pace with the popularity of social media, leaving a lot of “gray” areas and opportunities for compliance missteps.

In response, FINRA recently released a Regulatory Notice entitled, Social Media and Digital Communications: Guidance on Social Networking Websites and Business Communications. The guidance addresses the application of FINRA Rule 2210 to social media through a series of questions and answers.

Existing FINRA Guidance on Social Media

FINRA Rule 2210, which governs communications to the public, requires that broker-dealers’ communications are fair and balanced and do not omit material information that would cause them to be misleading. FINRA previously addressed how the rule applies to posts to social media sites and other digital communications. In addition to recordkeeping obligations, FINRA has provided guidance on third-party social media posts and hyperlinks to third-party websites.

In Regulatory Notices 10-06 and 11-39, FINRA advised firms that they are obligated to retain records of digital communications that relate to their “business as such” and that determining whether a communication must be retained depends on its content and not upon the type of device or technology used to transmit the communication.

Regulatory Notice 10-06 that, as a general matter, posts by customers or other third parties on social media sites established by a firm or its personnel do not constitute communications with the public by the firm or its associated persons under Rule 2210. Exceptions include if the firm or an associated person has (1) paid for or been involved in the preparation of the content (referred to as “entanglement”) or (2) explicitly or implicitly endorsed or approved the content (referred to as “adoption”).

Regulatory Notice 11-39 advised that a member may not establish a link to any third-party site that the firm knows or has reason to know contains false or misleading content and may not include a link on its website if there are any red flags that indicate the linked site contains false or misleading content. It further stated firms can be liable under FINRA rules for content on a linked third-party site if the firm has adopted or has become entangled with its content.

Updated FAQs on Social Media Compliance 

In April, FINRA offered additional guidance, citing the proliferation of social media as well as requests from the industry for greater clarity on certain issues. The guidance consists of 12 questions and answers, with topic ranging from testimonials to native advertising. Below are several highlights:

  • Text Messaging “Apps”: Firms that intend to communicate, or permit their associated persons to communicate, through a text messaging app or chat service must first ensure that they can retain records of any business-related communications.
  • Sharing Content: By sharing or linking to specific content, a firm adopts the content and would be responsible for ensuring that, when read in context with the statements in the originating post, the content complies with the same standards as communications created by, or on behalf of, the firm. However, by solely sharing or linking to content that contains links, a firm would not be responsible for the content available at such links.
  • Personal Communications: A communication by an associated person is subject to Rule 2210 only when the content relates to the products or services of the firm.
  • Native Advertising: Firms may use native advertising, which is defined as “content that bears a similarity to the news, feature articles, product reviews, entertainment and other material that surrounds it online,” so long as it complies with FINRA Rule 2210. In particular, native advertising must prominently disclose the firm’s name, reflect accurately any relationship between the firm and any other entity or individual who is also named, and reflect whether mentioned products or services are offered by the firm as required by Rule 2210(d)(3).
  • Use of “Influencers”: Firms should clearly identify as advertisements any communications that take the form of comments or posts by influencers and include the broker-dealer’s name as well as any other information required for compliance with Rule 2210.
  • Testimonials: FINRA does not regard unsolicited third-party opinions or comments posted on a social network to be communications of the broker-dealer or the representative for purposes of Rule 2210. However, by liking or sharing the favorable comments, the representative has adopted them, and they are now subject to FINRA’s communications rules.

Social media is a frequent area of concern during FINRA exams. FINRA has also conducted targeted social media “sweeps” in the past. Accordingly, member firms should thoroughly review the entire posting and discuss any compliance concerns with experienced counsel. Therefore, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract post image

Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]

Author: Graham Staton

Link to post with title - "Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract"
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement? post image

Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?"
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know post image

Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know"
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split post image

Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!