
Angela A. Turiano
Partner
212-784-6915 aturiano@sh-law.com
Partner
212-784-6915 aturiano@sh-law.com
Known as the “Supervision Rule,” FINRA Rule 3110 requires brokerage firms to establish, maintain, and enforce a system to supervise the activities of their associated persons.
The rule stipulates that the system of supervision should be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with all applicable regulations established by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Compliance with FINRA Rule 3110 is critical for brokerage firms to effectively manage risk and avoid costly liability. Establishing a robust supervisory system, however, is not only a key regulatory obligation but also helps broker-dealers build trust with investors and strengthen their business practices.
In this article, we explain the key elements of Rule 3110, as well as upcoming amendments to the rule that firms should have on their radar.
FINRA Rule 3110 sets forth the requirements for effective risk management practices within brokerage firms. As referenced above, the Rule requires brokerage firms to have reasonably designed written supervisory procedures (WSPs) in place to identify, monitor, and mitigate risks associated with their business. Among other requirements, a firm’s WSPs must address the supervision of supervisory personnel and provide for the review of a firm’s investment banking and securities business, correspondence and internal communications, and customer complaints. WSPs must also detail the specific individual(s) responsible for each review; the supervisory activities such persons will perform; the frequency of the review; and the manner of documentation.
Below is a summary of five key requirements of FINRA Rule 3110:
Changes to FINRA Rule 3110 are on the horizon. As set forth in FINRA’s Regulatory Notice 24-02, a new rule will take effect on July 1, 2024, which will establish a voluntary, three-year remote inspections pilot program. Specifically, new Rule 3110.18 will allow eligible member firms to fulfill their inspection obligation of qualified branch offices (under Rule 3110(c)(1)) without an on-site visit to such offices or locations.
Another rule change becomes effective on June 1, 2024. Under new Rule 3110.19, FINRA will treat a private residence at which an associated person engages in specified supervisory activities, as a non-branch location, subject to certain safeguards and limitations. As a non-branch location, the newly defined residential supervisory location (or RSL) will be subject to inspections on a regular periodic schedule (presumed to be at least every three years) rather than the annual inspections currently required for an office of supervisory jurisdiction (OSJ) and “supervisory branch office.”
The recent decade-plus of relative calm in the market has allowed regulators to spend more time and resources on aggressive investigation and enforcement. As such, it is more important than ever that firms stay informed and ahead of the curve by adopting a supervisory framework in full compliance with all relevant rules and regulations. Effectively developing, implementing, and enforcing such a supervisory framework can be daunting, especially in such a challenging regulatory environment. As such, brokerage firms are strongly advised to work with experienced counsel. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Regulatory Compliance Group is dedicated to helping firms achieve FINRA compliance in this challenging regulatory environment. We assist clients in building supervisory systems, navigating changes in supervisory obligations, and monitoring the effectiveness of their supervisory procedures to avoid enforcement efforts being directed at them.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!