On May 8, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published its Final Rule designating two per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) — as hazardous substances. The designation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) takes effect on July 8, 2024.
Key Impacts of EPA’s PFAS Hazardous Substance Designation
The Final Rule designating PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances imposes several new reporting obligations. As discussed in greater detail here, the EPA’s new rule requires the following:
Reporting and notification of releases of PFOA or PFOS, their salts, or structural isomers above the reportable quantity (one pound within a 24-hour period);
Notification by the U.S. Government when it transfers or sells certain properties of storage, release, or disposal of PFOA or PFOS on the property; and
Regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) of PFOA and PFOS as hazardous materials under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act.
The Final Rule also gives the EPA significant new enforcement authority, including the ability to order potentially responsible parties to test, remediate, or pay for the cleanup of sites contaminated with PFOA or PFOS under CERCLA. Under CERCLA section 106(a), the EPA can take enforcement actions against PRPs when there may be an imminent and substantial endangerment from an actual or threatened release of PFOA or PFOS.
The Final Rule will also allow the EPA to use CERCLA to recover costs expended by EPA to clean up PFOA and PFOS contamination. CERCLA section 107 provides that liable parties are responsible for the costs associated with responding to hazardous substances. Liable parties under CERCLA include:
Current owners and operators of facilities;
Past owners and facility operators in place at the time of hazardous substance disposal;
Any person who “arranged for disposal” of that facility’s hazardous substances; and
Any person that accepts hazardous substances for “transport to disposal or treatment facilities.”
If a person is liable for a release of hazardous substances, that person may be responsible to pay for response costs, natural resource damages, and assessment costs, and costs pertaining to certain health assessment or health effects studies.
EPA to Exercise PFAS Enforcement Discretion
Entities that may be affected by the EPA’s latest PFAS regulation include manufacturers, importers, processors, manufacturers, and downstream users of PFOA/PFOS and PFOA/PFOS products. Other potentially impacted businesses include waste management facilities and wastewater treatment facilities. Given the risk of CERCLA liability, these entities should closely monitor the EPA’s enforcement of the new designation.
In a Memorandum issued on April 19, 2024, the EPA explained that it will exercise its enforcement discretion under CERCLA in matters involving PFAS. According to the EPA, it plans to focus on holding responsible entities who “significantly contributed to the release of PFAS contamination into the environment, including parties that have manufactured PFAS or used PFAS in the manufacturing process, federal facilities, and other industrial parties.”
The Memorandum also states that the EPA does not intend to pursue entities where equitable factors do not support seeking response actions or costs under CERCLA, including community water systems and publicly owned treatment works; municipal separate storm sewer systems; publicly owned/operated municipal solid waste landfills; publicly owned airports and local fire departments; and farms where biosolids are applied to the land farmers. According to the agency, the exemption is contingent on an entity’s “full cooperation with EPA, including providing access and information when requested and not interfering with activities that EPA is taking or directing others to undertake to implement a CERCLA response action.”
We encourage impacted entities to contact the attorneys of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group with any questions. Our team will also continue to monitor the EPA’s actions to address PFAS and post updates as they become available.
Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Pet Trusts in New Jersey and New York: A Practical Estate Planning Tool
For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Read Before You Sign: IT Contract Pitfalls Every NJ Business Should Know
In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
