
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: October 17, 2014
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe definition of “accredited investor” may be headed for some significant changes. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Investor Advisory Committee is the latest group to call for an overhaul. This blogger likes the recommendation described below that restricts investors individually from risking too high a percentage of their personal assets in private placements. Such a restriction, which does not currently exist, would lessen the risk of an investor over-concentrating investments in private placements. This protection already exists for customers of brokerage firms, by virtue of a FINRA Rule against that can lead to sanctions against brokers who recommend over-concentrated investments in risky registered securities for a customer’s account. So, why not have it as a self-policing protection for investors making their own decisions to invest on their own into private placements?
Under the current definition, a natural person qualifies as an accredited investor if he or she has individual net worth – or joint net worth with a spouse – that exceeds $1 million at the time of the purchase, excluding the value of the primary residence of such person. Alternatively, an investor can qualify if he or she has income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000 for those years and a reasonable expectation of the same income level in the current year
The definition is important because it determines which investors are able to make an informed investment decision and protect their own interests in the absence of the protections of the Securities Act of 1933 . Only those investors deemed “accredited” are eligible to participate in private security offerings, such as those conducted in reliance on Rule 506 of Regulation D.
The SEC is required to review the accredited investor definition under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. So far, much of the debate has centered on whether the income thresholds should be increased. The current limits were enacted in the 1980s and have not been adjusted for inflation.
In its report, the Investor Advisory Committee raises concerns that the current definition is not sufficiently protecting investors. The group specifically notes that wealth does not necessarily result in financial sophistication and vice-versa.
“While reliance on income and net worth thresholds results in a definition that is clear and relatively simple to implement, this approach over-simplifies the factors that determine whether an individual truly has the wealth and liquidity to shoulder the potential risks of private offers,” the report further states.
Among its recommendations, the Investor Advisory Committee suggests revising the definition to provide other criteria for evaluating an investor’s financial savvy, such as possessing a FINRA Series 7 or other professional credentials. Other proposed approaches include evaluating individuals’ investment experience and/or testing their relevant financial knowledge.
Should the SEC elect to keep the financial thresholds in place, the Investor Advisory Committee suggests restricting the percentage of assets or income that someone can invest in private placements.
“Leaving aside the question of whether the financial thresholds are currently set at an appropriate level, the basic ‘on/off switch’ approach seems illogical,” the IAC argues. “A more sensible approach might be to allow some investments in private securities once a person reaches an initial threshold, based on percentage of income or assets, with restrictions being reduced and then eliminated as income or assets rise.”
Given how slowly the SEC has moved on other Dodd-Frank mandates, the accredited investor is unlikely to change anytime soon. However, the latest report highlights that there are many different options on the table, further suggesting that the debate is likely to continue for some time.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss securities regulation, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!