Joel N. Kreizman
Partner
732-568-8363 jkreizman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Court Refuses to Vacate Arbitration Award Over Past Contacts Between Lawyer and Arbitrator
Author: Joel N. Kreizman
Date: November 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
While the New Jersey legal community is quite large, many lawyers and judges develop professional relationships. In a recent decision, Federal District Judge William H. Walls addressed when arbitrators are required to disclose past contacts with attorneys who appear before them.
The Facts of the Case
Campmor, Inc., a retailer of recreational equipment, filed suit against Brulant, LLC, an Internet marketing firm, in 2009. After years of discovery, the two sides agreed to resolve their contract dispute through binding arbitration.
The arbitration agreement provided that the parties would select, by mutual agreChief Judge of the District of New Jersey Garrett E. Brownement, a retired U.S. Magistrate Judge or U.S. District Court Judge of the District of New Jersey to be their sole arbitrator. They ultimately selected former , who issued a detailed decision and final arbitration award on July 1, 2014. When Brulant moved to confirm the award, Campmor objected, arguing that the award should be vacated because Judge Brown did not disclose his past contacts with Brulant’s counsel Dennis Drasco.
In its motion, Campmor emphasized Judge Brown’s contact with Mr. Drasco through the Lawyers’ Advisory Committee, an organization whose membership includes all federal judges in the District of New Jersey and approximately forty-five to fifty attorneys and retired judges. Campmor also highlighted two public events that Judge Brown and Mr. Drasco both attended. They included a 2008 swearing-in ceremony for newly admitted attorneys in which Judge Brown and Mr. Drasco both participated, as well as a 2008 address to the New Jersey State Bar Association, in which Judge Brown recognized Mr. Drasco for having made a recommendation regarding oral argument in the District of New Jersey.
The Legal Background
The New Jersey Arbitration Act provides that “an individual who is requested to serve as an arbitrator, after making a reasonable inquiry, shall disclose to all parties . . . any known facts that a reasonable person would consider likely to affect the impartiality of the arbitrator in the arbitration proceeding, including: . . . (2) an existing or past relationship with any of the parties to the agreement to arbitrate or the arbitration proceeding, their counsel or representatives, a witness, or other arbitrators.” If a party fails to make a required disclosure, the statute provides that a reviewing court may vacate an award.
The Court’s Decision
The court refused to vacate the award, finding the relationship was “administrative and routine.” As highlighted in the opinion, the arbitrator did not share a deep professional relationship with Drasco, but rather all of the contacts derived from his service as chief judge of the District of New Jersey.
“Placed in context, it gives the reasonable person no reason to question Judge Brown’s impartiality in a later, unrelated arbitration in which Mr. Drasco participated as counsel,” the court held.
The court further noted that the “professional familiarity” was to be expected. “When parties agree to select a retired judge from a particular district as their arbitrator, they must anticipate the judge’s professional familiarity with many of the lawyers who practice in that district,” Judge Walls explained.
If you have questions about this case or would like to discuss business arbitration, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Court Refuses to Vacate Arbitration Award Over Past Contacts Between Lawyer and Arbitrator
Author: Joel N. Kreizman
While the New Jersey legal community is quite large, many lawyers and judges develop professional relationships. In a recent decision, Federal District Judge William H. Walls addressed when arbitrators are required to disclose past contacts with attorneys who appear before them.
The Facts of the Case
Campmor, Inc., a retailer of recreational equipment, filed suit against Brulant, LLC, an Internet marketing firm, in 2009. After years of discovery, the two sides agreed to resolve their contract dispute through binding arbitration.
The arbitration agreement provided that the parties would select, by mutual agreChief Judge of the District of New Jersey Garrett E. Brownement, a retired U.S. Magistrate Judge or U.S. District Court Judge of the District of New Jersey to be their sole arbitrator. They ultimately selected former , who issued a detailed decision and final arbitration award on July 1, 2014. When Brulant moved to confirm the award, Campmor objected, arguing that the award should be vacated because Judge Brown did not disclose his past contacts with Brulant’s counsel Dennis Drasco.
In its motion, Campmor emphasized Judge Brown’s contact with Mr. Drasco through the Lawyers’ Advisory Committee, an organization whose membership includes all federal judges in the District of New Jersey and approximately forty-five to fifty attorneys and retired judges. Campmor also highlighted two public events that Judge Brown and Mr. Drasco both attended. They included a 2008 swearing-in ceremony for newly admitted attorneys in which Judge Brown and Mr. Drasco both participated, as well as a 2008 address to the New Jersey State Bar Association, in which Judge Brown recognized Mr. Drasco for having made a recommendation regarding oral argument in the District of New Jersey.
The Legal Background
The New Jersey Arbitration Act provides that “an individual who is requested to serve as an arbitrator, after making a reasonable inquiry, shall disclose to all parties . . . any known facts that a reasonable person would consider likely to affect the impartiality of the arbitrator in the arbitration proceeding, including: . . . (2) an existing or past relationship with any of the parties to the agreement to arbitrate or the arbitration proceeding, their counsel or representatives, a witness, or other arbitrators.” If a party fails to make a required disclosure, the statute provides that a reviewing court may vacate an award.
The Court’s Decision
The court refused to vacate the award, finding the relationship was “administrative and routine.” As highlighted in the opinion, the arbitrator did not share a deep professional relationship with Drasco, but rather all of the contacts derived from his service as chief judge of the District of New Jersey.
“Placed in context, it gives the reasonable person no reason to question Judge Brown’s impartiality in a later, unrelated arbitration in which Mr. Drasco participated as counsel,” the court held.
The court further noted that the “professional familiarity” was to be expected. “When parties agree to select a retired judge from a particular district as their arbitrator, they must anticipate the judge’s professional familiarity with many of the lawyers who practice in that district,” Judge Walls explained.
If you have questions about this case or would like to discuss business arbitration, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.