
Robert A. Marsico
Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert A. Marsico
Date: March 26, 2015

Partner
201-896-7165 rmarsico@sh-law.comAs previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business News Blog, the SEC’s whistleblower program provides financial incentives to individuals who report original, high-quality information about a securities fraud that results in an enforcement action with sanctions exceeding $1 million. Whistleblowers may be awarded from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected in a case. The SEC has awarded nearly $50 million to 15 whistleblowers since the program launched three years ago.
In most cases, whistleblowers must report information that they learn about firsthand. Accordingly, officers, directors, trustees, or partners who learn about a fraud through another employee reporting the misconduct generally are not eligible for an award. However, there are a few exceptions. For instance, corporate officers can qualify as whistleblowers in cases where investors will be substantially harmed if a potential securities violation is not reported or there is a reasonable belief that the company is engaging in conduct that would impede an investigation.
In this case, the whistleblower was entitled to the award because he or she reported the information to the SEC more than 120 days after other responsible compliance personnel possessed the information and failed to adequately address the issue. This is the SEC’s first award under the exception.
According to Sean McKessy, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower, “Receiving information and cooperation from company insiders is particularly useful in the early detection of securities fraud, and we will continue to leverage whistleblower information to help combat securities law violations and better protect investors and the marketplace.” He further stressed that “companies must have rigorous internal compliance programs that adequately address and remedy potential violations voiced by their employees as well as by their officers, directors, or other individuals.”
As this SEC announcement reinforces, companies must have robust internal reporting systems in place to address complaints of misconduct. Even corporate officers can become whistleblowers if they do not feel that the company is adequately addressing their concerns.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!