Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 1, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe new facility coincides with the implementation of an Executive Order that prohibits federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of gender identity. The Order also amends anti-discrimination laws for federal workers by adding gender identity to the list of protected categories.
According to the Obama Administration, the new federal laws will impact approximately 1.5 million workers and 24,000 companies with federal contractor designation. Even if your business is not specifically impacted, employers should have policies and procedures in place to address issues related to gender identity and gender transitioning.
In 2012, the EEOC ruled that employment discrimination against employees because they are transgender, because of their gender identity, and/or because they have transitioned (or intend to transition) constitutes sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Last year, the Department of Justice issued a memo also recognizing that transgender people are protected under the civil rights statute.
In 2014, the EEOC began to test the commission’s position in federal court by filing a series of lawsuits alleging that employers violated Title VII by terminating transgender workers who did not conform to the employer’s gender-based expectations, preferences, or stereotypes. Earlier this month, the EEOC announced that one of its first transgender lawsuits had settled.
According to the agency, Lakeland Eye Clinic will pay $150,000 to resolve charges that it terminated an employee after she informed them she was transgender and intended to start presenting as a woman. The clinic also agreed to implement a new gender discrimination policy and to provide training to its management and employees regarding transgender/gender stereotype discrimination.
“This historic settlement is significant,” said David Lopez, EEOC General Counsel. “It not only is one of the first two lawsuits ever filed by the Commission alleging sex discrimination against a transgender individual, but it also solidifies the EEOC’s commitment to enforcing the rights of transgender employees secured by Title VII.”
In another significant legal development this month, the EEOC also ordered the Department of the Army to pay damages to a transgender civilian employee who was prohibited from using a restroom that matched her new identity and repeatedly referred to by her former gender.
“We recognize that certain employees may object — some vigorously — to allowing a transgender individual to use the restroom consistent with his or her gender identity,” the EEOC ruling stated. “But supervisory or co-worker confusion or anxiety cannot justify discriminatory terms and conditions of employment.
The EEOC is fulfilling its mission to make gender identity discrimination a top enforcement priority for FY2013-2016. According to the EEOC’s enforcement data, the agency received more than 300 Title VII charges related to gender identity during 2013 and the first half of 2014. The latest EEOC victories will only further solidify the enforcement trend.
Studies also show that without strong policies in place, employment discrimination is likely to occur. More than 40 percent of lesbian, gay, and bisexual workers have suffered employment discrimination due to their sexual orientation. Moreover, 90 percent of transgender employees have experienced harassment, mistreatment, or discrimination the workplace.
In New Jersey, the Law Against Discrimination includes “gender identity and expression” as a protected class. Accordingly, any discrimination and/or retaliation against transgender workers would be proper grounds for an employment lawsuit under state law. Employers should consider the implications of failing to have adequate restroom facilities and policies in place to prohibit discrimination. If you have any questions please contact our office.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!