Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 1, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe new facility coincides with the implementation of an Executive Order that prohibits federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of gender identity. The Order also amends anti-discrimination laws for federal workers by adding gender identity to the list of protected categories.
According to the Obama Administration, the new federal laws will impact approximately 1.5 million workers and 24,000 companies with federal contractor designation. Even if your business is not specifically impacted, employers should have policies and procedures in place to address issues related to gender identity and gender transitioning.
In 2012, the EEOC ruled that employment discrimination against employees because they are transgender, because of their gender identity, and/or because they have transitioned (or intend to transition) constitutes sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Last year, the Department of Justice issued a memo also recognizing that transgender people are protected under the civil rights statute.
In 2014, the EEOC began to test the commission’s position in federal court by filing a series of lawsuits alleging that employers violated Title VII by terminating transgender workers who did not conform to the employer’s gender-based expectations, preferences, or stereotypes. Earlier this month, the EEOC announced that one of its first transgender lawsuits had settled.
According to the agency, Lakeland Eye Clinic will pay $150,000 to resolve charges that it terminated an employee after she informed them she was transgender and intended to start presenting as a woman. The clinic also agreed to implement a new gender discrimination policy and to provide training to its management and employees regarding transgender/gender stereotype discrimination.
“This historic settlement is significant,” said David Lopez, EEOC General Counsel. “It not only is one of the first two lawsuits ever filed by the Commission alleging sex discrimination against a transgender individual, but it also solidifies the EEOC’s commitment to enforcing the rights of transgender employees secured by Title VII.”
In another significant legal development this month, the EEOC also ordered the Department of the Army to pay damages to a transgender civilian employee who was prohibited from using a restroom that matched her new identity and repeatedly referred to by her former gender.
“We recognize that certain employees may object — some vigorously — to allowing a transgender individual to use the restroom consistent with his or her gender identity,” the EEOC ruling stated. “But supervisory or co-worker confusion or anxiety cannot justify discriminatory terms and conditions of employment.
The EEOC is fulfilling its mission to make gender identity discrimination a top enforcement priority for FY2013-2016. According to the EEOC’s enforcement data, the agency received more than 300 Title VII charges related to gender identity during 2013 and the first half of 2014. The latest EEOC victories will only further solidify the enforcement trend.
Studies also show that without strong policies in place, employment discrimination is likely to occur. More than 40 percent of lesbian, gay, and bisexual workers have suffered employment discrimination due to their sexual orientation. Moreover, 90 percent of transgender employees have experienced harassment, mistreatment, or discrimination the workplace.
In New Jersey, the Law Against Discrimination includes “gender identity and expression” as a protected class. Accordingly, any discrimination and/or retaliation against transgender workers would be proper grounds for an employment lawsuit under state law. Employers should consider the implications of failing to have adequate restroom facilities and policies in place to prohibit discrimination. If you have any questions please contact our office.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!