Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 23, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
As businesses struggle to stay afloat amid the COVID-19 pandemic, online reviews shared on websites and social media have become increasingly important. Unfortunately, online public discourse is often dominated by trolls, harassers, and other bad actors. In some cases, businesses can be unfairly targeted with abusive, fake, and inaccurate online reviews. It is vital for businesses to differentiate between a negative customer review and one generated by a troll or other bad actor. A business’s response to negative online reviews is tantamount to its survival.
So what can businesses do if they are the subject of negative online reviews?
Overwhelmingly positive reviews will generally drown out a few bad ones. But, it’s important to understand your legal obligations. Businesses should avoid review “astroturfing,” which involves preparing or disseminating a fake positive review that a reasonable consumer would believe to be a neutral, third-party testimonial. Instead, businesses should offer numerous ways for their customers to quickly and easily provide feedback, i.e. a comment card, online form, or website link on a receipt.
Ultimately, providing a quality product or service along with excellent customer service is the most effective way to generate positive reviews. Similarly, providing customers with an effective means to resolve disputes can often help turn an unhappy customer into a satisfied one.
Remember to “never feed a troll.” In many cases, trolls are seeking attention; by engaging with them, you will often make the situation worse. If the troll is posting on social media, it is often possible to block them from posting on your account. If the conduct violates the platform’s terms of service, you can also report them. The same applies to fake online reviews. Sites like Amazon, Facebook, and Yelp have procedures in place to report reviews.
Make sure that your response does not result in unintended liability. The Consumer Review Fairness Act makes it illegal for businesses to include standardized contract provisions, including in their online terms and conditions, that threaten or penalize people for posting honest reviews. The statute was enacted in response to concerns that some businesses were trying to prevent consumers from giving honest reviews about products or services they received.
That means you can’t seek to prevent all negative reviews by including non-disparagement provisions in your consumer form contracts. The Consumer Review Fairness Act expressly prohibits a contract provision that:
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is empowered to penalize violators under its authority to prevent deceptive trade practices and unfair competition. On the state level, attorneys general are also authorized to bring actions under the law.
It is important to note that the Consumer Fairness Review Act contains exceptions that allow businesses to protect themselves from certain types of negative reviews. Under the statute, it is permissible to prohibit or remove a review that:
Because many of the items above require a judgement call, it is advisable to consult an attorney to determine whether the statute applies. As highlighted by the FTC, it is unlikely that a consumer’s assessment or opinion with which you disagree meets the “clearly false or misleading” standard.
With the growing popularity of social media and websites like Yelp!, customers have numerous public platforms to provide feedback about your business. When the opinions are not so positive, it can be tempting to try to squelch them. However, companies must be careful when managing negative online criticism.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!