
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 19, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe company filed for protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Brooklyn, New York. Like many other textbook publishers, it has struggled to remain profitable as more consumers move toward online publishing materials and resources. Cengage said it has entered into a restructuring agreement with lenders – including JPMorgan Chase & Co , KKR Asset Management, BlackRock Inc., and Oaktree Capital Management – who hold $2 billion of first-lien debt, Reuters reports.

Overall, the restructuring is designed to help Cengage shed roughly $4 billion in debt from its balance sheets. In addition, Cengage noted that it has substantial cash balances and expects to generate positive cash flow, and it therefore does not intend to obtain debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing. Further, the company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries are not included in the U.S. Chapter 11 filings and will continue to operate without interruption.
“The decisive actions we are taking today will reduce our debt and improve our capital structure to support our long-term business strategy of transitioning from traditional print models to digital educational and research materials,” said Michael Hansen, Cengage Learning’s chief executive.
Cengage Learning, formerly Thompson Learning, was acquired in a 2007 leveraged buyout by private equity firm Apax Partners and Omers Capital Partners. The company later purchased the college publishing division of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing for $750 million, and in 2011, acquired National Geographic’s digital and print school publishing unit, the New York Times reports.
The company, which has 5,500 employees and about $2 billion in annual revenue, said in a statement that it plans to continue making payments to vendors in a timely fashion during bankruptcy proceedings, and will maintain its employee compensation and benefit programs.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!