There is a trend occurring in the world of celebrity sports that may soon spread to movie stars and other celebrities: personal brand IPOs.
While there is no specific case being brought to attention – at the moment – related to this possibility, it could potentially result in interesting legal and financial consequences, when it comes to IPOs.
Before we discuss the potential results of such a venture and the companies that are looking to enter this field, we should first define the terms “IPOs” and “insider trading.”
What are IPOs
IPOs – or Initial Public Offering – is the event that occurs when a company is first “taken public.” For the beginning of most companies’ lives, investment is limited to private sources at the discretion of those companies’ leadership. This means that if I were to launch a new company called “Example LLC,” you would be unable to invest in it unless you approached me and we agreed to work out a deal.
As Example LLC grows, it might reach a point where it needs a large amount of funding to continue growing. Debt and private investment are very possible avenues to back this funding, however, I might decide that public investment is a better course of action.
I would then begin negotiations with one or more investment banks that would act as underwriters for my IPO. The bank and I would work together to reach a share price and equity level that would meet the needs of the company while still allowing the bank to make a profit. I might then sell 10,000 shares of Example LLC at $10/share for a total of 15 percent of the equity in the company. Example LLC would have $100,000 with which to grow, and the banks that bought these shares could go on to sell them on a securities exchange for a markup.
Insider trading
Insider trading occurs when an individual who may or may not hold shares in a company receives knowledge from within the company that gives him or her knowledge about the future value of its shares. This allows the individual to compete unfairly in the securities market.
As a simple example, imagine that one of my friends were to purchase shares worth 5 percent equity in Example LLC. Everything appears to be going well, but I now know that a much anticipated deal between Example LLC and Illustration Corp is about to fall through – rendering my friend’s shares worthless. If I were to tell my friend about this situation and he or she were to sell these shares before the failed deal became public knowledge, this would constitute insider trading.
There are a number of laws on the books that outlaw insider trading, but notably 17 CFR 240.10b5-1, which attributes criminal penalties to trading on the basis of material nonpublic information.
Celebrity IPOs
In general, celebrity IPOs allow individuals of high public interest to sell portions of their future earnings in exchange for large sums of money in their pockets. Already, a company called Fantex has launched IPOs for Vernon Davis of the San Fransisco 49ers and E.J. Manuel of the Buffalo Bills. The company has focused thus far on sports stars, but hopes to soon move to actors and musicians with projectable cash-flow streams.
There are obvious advantages for everyone involved, but also potential legal pitfalls. Large numbers of people frequently have early information about upcoming contracts in the entertainment industr, and these people are less centralized or traceable than the employees of a company. This could give rise to problems with insider trading.
There are also issues with fiduciary duty. Once a company makes an IPO, the directors of that company have a legal duty to act in the best interests of their shareholders. Fantex says that the celebrities it represents “remain the CEO of their brand,” but it is difficult to tell what might happen if a celebrity made a large IPO and then decided to retire.
Celebrity IPOs appear to be legal at the moment, and may be attractive to fans who believe in the potential earnings of their chosen star or who simply want to show their support. I would suggest, however, that investors remain extremely cautious before treading in this as-of-yet largely uncharted legal territory.
As a New York entertainment attorney I come across many cases regarding celebrities and their legal issues. Check out some of my previous posts regarding this topic:
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
On Celebrity IPOs
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
There is a trend occurring in the world of celebrity sports that may soon spread to movie stars and other celebrities: personal brand IPOs.
While there is no specific case being brought to attention – at the moment – related to this possibility, it could potentially result in interesting legal and financial consequences, when it comes to IPOs.
Before we discuss the potential results of such a venture and the companies that are looking to enter this field, we should first define the terms “IPOs” and “insider trading.”
What are IPOs
IPOs – or Initial Public Offering – is the event that occurs when a company is first “taken public.” For the beginning of most companies’ lives, investment is limited to private sources at the discretion of those companies’ leadership. This means that if I were to launch a new company called “Example LLC,” you would be unable to invest in it unless you approached me and we agreed to work out a deal.
As Example LLC grows, it might reach a point where it needs a large amount of funding to continue growing. Debt and private investment are very possible avenues to back this funding, however, I might decide that public investment is a better course of action.
I would then begin negotiations with one or more investment banks that would act as underwriters for my IPO. The bank and I would work together to reach a share price and equity level that would meet the needs of the company while still allowing the bank to make a profit. I might then sell 10,000 shares of Example LLC at $10/share for a total of 15 percent of the equity in the company. Example LLC would have $100,000 with which to grow, and the banks that bought these shares could go on to sell them on a securities exchange for a markup.
Insider trading
Insider trading occurs when an individual who may or may not hold shares in a company receives knowledge from within the company that gives him or her knowledge about the future value of its shares. This allows the individual to compete unfairly in the securities market.
As a simple example, imagine that one of my friends were to purchase shares worth 5 percent equity in Example LLC. Everything appears to be going well, but I now know that a much anticipated deal between Example LLC and Illustration Corp is about to fall through – rendering my friend’s shares worthless. If I were to tell my friend about this situation and he or she were to sell these shares before the failed deal became public knowledge, this would constitute insider trading.
There are a number of laws on the books that outlaw insider trading, but notably 17 CFR 240.10b5-1, which attributes criminal penalties to trading on the basis of material nonpublic information.
Celebrity IPOs
In general, celebrity IPOs allow individuals of high public interest to sell portions of their future earnings in exchange for large sums of money in their pockets. Already, a company called Fantex has launched IPOs for Vernon Davis of the San Fransisco 49ers and E.J. Manuel of the Buffalo Bills. The company has focused thus far on sports stars, but hopes to soon move to actors and musicians with projectable cash-flow streams.
There are obvious advantages for everyone involved, but also potential legal pitfalls. Large numbers of people frequently have early information about upcoming contracts in the entertainment industr, and these people are less centralized or traceable than the employees of a company. This could give rise to problems with insider trading.
There are also issues with fiduciary duty. Once a company makes an IPO, the directors of that company have a legal duty to act in the best interests of their shareholders. Fantex says that the celebrities it represents “remain the CEO of their brand,” but it is difficult to tell what might happen if a celebrity made a large IPO and then decided to retire.
Celebrity IPOs appear to be legal at the moment, and may be attractive to fans who believe in the potential earnings of their chosen star or who simply want to show their support. I would suggest, however, that investors remain extremely cautious before treading in this as-of-yet largely uncharted legal territory.
As a New York entertainment attorney I come across many cases regarding celebrities and their legal issues. Check out some of my previous posts regarding this topic:
