
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: May 13, 2019
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe inability to access financial institutions continues to inhibit the growth of cannabis businesses, even in states where it is legal. Given that marijuana cultivation, sale, and possession of marijuana in the U.S. is still illegal under federal law, banks have hesitated to provide services to businesses in the marijuana industry. However, a legislative solution that would address the growing divide between state and federal law is gaining momentum.
On March 28, the House Financial Services Committee advanced the “Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act of 2019” (SAFE Banking Act) (H.R. 1595). In doing so, the SAFE Banking Act became only the third standalone marijuana reform bill to clear a congressional committee. On April 15, a companion bill was introduced in the Senate by several lawmakers, including New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez.
Under the proposed legislation, a federal banking regulator may not “prohibit, penalize, or otherwise discourage a depository institution from providing financial services to a cannabis-related legitimate business or to a State or political subdivision of a State that exercises jurisdiction over cannabis-related legitimate businesses.”
The bill further provides that a depository institution that provides financial services to a cannabis-related legitimate business in a state where marijuana has been legalized may not be held liable pursuant to any Federal law or regulation solely for providing such financial services pursuant to the state law or regulation, or for further investing any income derived from such financial services.
The SAFE Banking Act also provides protections for ancillary businesses. It provides that the proceeds from a transaction conducted by a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider would not be considered as proceeds from an unlawful activity solely because the transaction was conducted by a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.
The legislation would also direct the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council and other federal regulators to issue guidance and exam procedures for banks that serve cannabis-related legitimate businesses. The final version approved by the committee also requires federal financial regulators to publish annual reports tracking “information and data on the availability of access to financial services for minority-owned and women-owned cannabis-related legitimate businesses” and to issue “regulatory or legislative recommendations for expanding access to financial services” for those groups.
Federal Reserve Bank presidents are among those calling for clear regulations to govern the provision of financial services to the cannabis industry. During a panel at the American Bankers Association summit, three bank leaders unanimously agreed that Congress needs to act.
“For better or for worse, we’re responsible to follow federal law, and so we would very much like to have clarification on this,” Tom Barkin, CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, said. “Whatever legislative answer gets us to clarity would be our preferred outcome.”
Raphael Bostic, CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, agreed. “There’s not really a clear thing for us to say—we can’t give anyone 100 percent certainty in terms of how this is going to turn out,” he said. “I do hope that we get some legislative clarity sooner rather than later. I would love some resolution, one way or the other, as soon as we possibly can because this has only become more prominent.”
The SAFE Banking Act, which currently has 169 cosponsors in the House and 20 in the Senate, is expected to proceed to a full House vote in the next several weeks. While its likelihood of passage in the Democrat-majority House is high, the legislation’s prospects in the Republican-controlled Senate are far less certain.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!