
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: May 13, 2019

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe inability to access financial institutions continues to inhibit the growth of cannabis businesses, even in states where it is legal. Given that marijuana cultivation, sale, and possession of marijuana in the U.S. is still illegal under federal law, banks have hesitated to provide services to businesses in the marijuana industry. However, a legislative solution that would address the growing divide between state and federal law is gaining momentum.
On March 28, the House Financial Services Committee advanced the “Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act of 2019” (SAFE Banking Act) (H.R. 1595). In doing so, the SAFE Banking Act became only the third standalone marijuana reform bill to clear a congressional committee. On April 15, a companion bill was introduced in the Senate by several lawmakers, including New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez.
Under the proposed legislation, a federal banking regulator may not “prohibit, penalize, or otherwise discourage a depository institution from providing financial services to a cannabis-related legitimate business or to a State or political subdivision of a State that exercises jurisdiction over cannabis-related legitimate businesses.”
The bill further provides that a depository institution that provides financial services to a cannabis-related legitimate business in a state where marijuana has been legalized may not be held liable pursuant to any Federal law or regulation solely for providing such financial services pursuant to the state law or regulation, or for further investing any income derived from such financial services.
The SAFE Banking Act also provides protections for ancillary businesses. It provides that the proceeds from a transaction conducted by a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider would not be considered as proceeds from an unlawful activity solely because the transaction was conducted by a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.
The legislation would also direct the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council and other federal regulators to issue guidance and exam procedures for banks that serve cannabis-related legitimate businesses. The final version approved by the committee also requires federal financial regulators to publish annual reports tracking “information and data on the availability of access to financial services for minority-owned and women-owned cannabis-related legitimate businesses” and to issue “regulatory or legislative recommendations for expanding access to financial services” for those groups.
Federal Reserve Bank presidents are among those calling for clear regulations to govern the provision of financial services to the cannabis industry. During a panel at the American Bankers Association summit, three bank leaders unanimously agreed that Congress needs to act.
“For better or for worse, we’re responsible to follow federal law, and so we would very much like to have clarification on this,” Tom Barkin, CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, said. “Whatever legislative answer gets us to clarity would be our preferred outcome.”
Raphael Bostic, CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, agreed. “There’s not really a clear thing for us to say—we can’t give anyone 100 percent certainty in terms of how this is going to turn out,” he said. “I do hope that we get some legislative clarity sooner rather than later. I would love some resolution, one way or the other, as soon as we possibly can because this has only become more prominent.”
The SAFE Banking Act, which currently has 169 cosponsors in the House and 20 in the Senate, is expected to proceed to a full House vote in the next several weeks. While its likelihood of passage in the Democrat-majority House is high, the legislation’s prospects in the Republican-controlled Senate are far less certain.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Running a business in New Jersey and New York means operating within one of the most legally complex environments in the country. From the moment you form your company to the day you sell it, and every contract, hire, dispute, and transaction in between, business law is present in decisions that look, on the surface, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!