
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comGetting a New York start-up company off the ground can be a challenging task. In fact, 8 out of 10 entrepreneurs who start a business fail within the first 18 months.
Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Corporate Transactions & Business Practice Group regularly works with entrepreneurs and other business professionals to address the legal obstacles that New York start-ups face. Our attorneys also frequently share legal updates and insights on the firm website.
Below are six start-up tips that we provided throughout the past year:
(1) Pros/Cons of Incubators and Accelerators: By providing mentorship and other resources, incubators and accelerators can help start-ups avoid common entrepreneurial pitfalls and speed up the process of raising capital and growing a business. However, they are not right for every business, and it is important to do your research before signing on the dotted line.
(2) Using Finders to Secure Funding: A New York start-up company or private investment fund can face unintended liability when they use third-party “finders” to identify and solicit investors to provide capital via a private securities offering. Even the use of employees to solicit funds for their employers can fall afoul of securities laws if not structured properly. In many cases, these individuals perform activities that require registration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC).
(3) Debt vs Equity Financing: There are several different types of financing structures that may be available for initial start-up investments. Most involve some combination of equity or debt. Start-ups should be aware of the relative benefits and disadvantages of taking on debt versus taking in equity. More importantly, when reviewing term sheets presented to them, it is imperative that start-up founders be able to fully understand the terms.
(4) Alter Ego Liability: Start-ups and other New York businesses should be aware that there are circumstances under which courts will hold an LLC or corporation’s owners, members, and shareholders personally liable for business debts by “piercing the corporate veil.” Liability typically arises when a plaintiff claims that an LLC or corporation is not a distinct entity, but rather an “alter-ego” being used by the owners, members, and/or shareholders to advance their own personal interests or to perpetrate a fraud.
(5) Confidential IPO Filing: In an effort to boost capital formation, the SEC announced in July that it will accept voluntary draft registration statement submissions from all issuers for nonpublic review. The ability to keep filings confidential in the early stages of an initial public offering (IPO) was previously limited to emerging growth companies. Filing confidentially allows companies to work out any issues with the SEC outside of the public spotlight and reduces the potential for lengthy exposure to competitive risks and market fluctuations that can negatively impact the offering process.
(6) Delay of International Entrepreneur Rule: The Obama-era International Entrepreneur Rule, which would allow immigrant start-up founders to enter the country for up to five years under certain conditions, was slated to take effect in July. The National Venture Capital Association and several startup companies are now suing the Trump Administration over its decision to delay the immigration regulation.
Of course, this post offers only a brief review. To learn more about the issues discussed, I encourage you to click through to the relevant blog post linked above. Otherwise, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!