
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: June 30, 2017
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comLimited liability is one of the greatest advantages of establishing a corporation or limited liability corporation (LLC) because it shields New York business owners from personal liability for business debts. However, limited liability is not unconditional.
Therefore, start-ups and other New York businesses should be aware that there are circumstances under which courts will hold an LLC or corporation’s owners, members, and shareholders personally liable for business debts by “piercing the corporate veil.” Liability typically arises when a plaintiff claims that an LLC or corporation is not a distinct entity, but rather an “alter-ego” being used by the owners, members, and/or shareholders to advance their own personal interests or perpetrate a fraud.
To ensure you don’t end up in this situation, here are a few guidelines to keep in mind:
This is certainly not an exhaustive list, and courts make a detailed analysis before deciding whether to impose personal liability on the company’s principals.
If a court pierces the corporate veil, the company’s owners, members, and/or shareholders can be held personally responsible for the company’s liabilities. This means your personal assets, such as your bank account, your car and even your home, then become accessible to creditors and others seeking relief. If you are concerned about your potential liability for the debts of your business, it is always a good idea to consult with an experienced business attorney.
One final point: do not dissolve your corporation during a lawsuit. There are a number of decisions holding shareholders liable for corporate obligations solely because they chose to dissolve their corporation during litigation against the company.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!