When Seeking to Buy a Business, One of the First Decisions You Need to Make is Whether to structure the Transaction as a Stock Purchase or an Asset Purchase
When seeking to buy a business, one of the first decisions you need to make is whether to structure the transaction as a stock purchase or an asset purchase. As with any business decision, there are advantages and disadvantages of each that must be carefully considered.
In the case of purchasing a sole proprietorship, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC), the decision is already made for you because the business entities do not have stock. Although, in addition to buying the business’s assets, you may also be able to buy a member’s interest in a partnership or LLC.
Liability in Asset Purchase Compared to a Stock Purchase
When acquiring a C-corporation or S-corporation, the structure of the transaction can determine how much liability you assume. If you buy control of the stock of the corporation that owns the business, you take ownership of the business, and responsibility to pay its liabilities and potential liabilities. Because buyers of stock step into their acquired business in a stock sale, these deals require businesses to perform due diligence and to investigate and understand the liabilities and potential liabilities of the acquired business operations.
For example, there may be pending or threatened litigations, or issues of liability involving taxes, customer claims, workers’ compensation, pension or unemployment benefits, independent contractor misclassification, or even for traffic accidents or unpaid invoices. These all become your responsibility as the buyer in a stock sale.
Although there are contract provisions that are often utilized to protect the buyer, the best protection is a quality due diligence investigation of the business by outside counsel. If there are liabilities disclosed or discovered, and also to protect against undiscovered liabilities, counsel can prepare provisions for the acquisition or merger agreement that include indemnification, hold back of a portion of the purchase price, or a deferred business earn-out payment.
If you buy the business’s assets, you may choose to buy some or all of the assets of the target business. In doing so, you may be able to avoid the liabilities of the business. This is because, if properly structured in an asset purchase agreement, you are only buying assets rather than the operating business and its liabilities. The asset purchase must be carefully crafted so that the buyer in an asset sale does not inherit liabilities. Issues can arise related to integrating the business’ employees into your company’s business, so union contracts and state laws are considered. You may wind up hiring all, or only some, of the employees; often, some of the employees are let go after a trial period, and this can require treading carefully.
Additional Considerations in Asset Purchase vs Stock Purchase
When considering a business acquisition, there are several other considerations to keep in mind. In many cases, an asset sale is less complex. Buyers do not have to worry about minority shareholders that may be unwilling to sell their stock. In addition, there are few, if any, securities regulations with which to contend. In terms of tax obligations, if the purchase price is greater than the aggregate tax basis of the assets purchased, the buyer receives a stepped-up basis in the assets equal to the purchase price.
Despite these advantages, a stock sale also has certain merits. In a stock transaction, you don’t have to go through the hassle of having the acquired company’s assets re-titled in your name. In addition, a stock transaction generally allows you to obtain the acquired company’s non-assignable contracts, permits, and licenses without obtaining the consent of the other party to the transaction. There may be contract provisions that were entered into by the seller that void the contract on the sale of control; your due diligence investigation should include a review of all material contracts.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
