
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThree years after being overhauled, issuers are beginning to take advantage of Regulation A with greater frequency. However, it still remains one of the lesser-used capital-raising tools. One reason for this is that only a few brokerage firms are presently underwriting Regulation A offerings.
To allow a larger number of companies to undertake securities offerings in reliance on the revamped Regulation A, additional changes are forthcoming. Under the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Act), which President Donald Trump signed into law on May 24, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must again revise Regulation A+, this time to allow public companies to use it to offer securities.
Regulation A allows certain issuers to raise capital without going through the costly process of conducting a registered public offering or complying with the accredited investor and/or solicitation restrictions associated with Rule 506(b) or 506(c) private placements under Regulation D. Issuers are also authorized to gauge investor interest by “testing the waters.”
Despite these benefits, Regulation A remains one of the most infrequently used exemptions to SEC registration. Prior amendments to Regulation A, dubbed “Regulation A+,” now allow smaller companies to offer and sell up to $50 million of securities in a 12-month period. Enacted as part of the JOBS Act, the changes aimed to make the exemption more widely available and to provide small businesses with greater access to capital.
Regulation A+ includes two tiers of securities offerings, each with its separate set of requirements. Tier 1 covers securities offerings of up to $20 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $6 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer. Meanwhile, Tier 2 includes securities offerings of up to $50 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $15 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer.
Notably, Tier 1 still requires the approval from state securities regulators, whereas the rules provide for the preemption of state securities law registration and qualification requirements for Tier 2 securities. In addition to the basic requirements set forth in Regulation A, companies conducting Tier 2 offerings are subject to other requirements. For instance, they are required to provide audited financial statements and file annual, semiannual and current event reports with the SEC. In addition, securities purchases for non-accredited investors are limited to no more than 10 percent of the greater of the investor’s annual income or net worth.
Under the Act, the SEC will again expand the reach of Regulation A. The exemption currently excludes public reporting companies, which means that they must generally rely on fully registered public offerings to raise capital. To increase the number of companies that can take advantage of Regulation A, the Act specifically eliminates the requirement that an issuer not be subject to certain reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, immediately before an offering.
Because Regulation A offers a streamlined and less costly SEC review process, the new changes are welcome news for companies seeking to raise capital. For companies conducting Tier 2 offerings, the exemption also allows companies to bypass state blue sky review. Under the Act, the periodic reports filed by public reporting companies would be deemed to meet the reporting and disclosure requirements under a Tier 2 offering.
The latest changes do not take effect immediately. Rather, the Act requires the SEC to enact amendments to Regulation A to implement its provisions. We expect to see an increased number of brokerage firms underwriting Regulation A offerings when the new changes take effect. We will continue to track the process of the regulatory changes and post updates as they become available.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!