Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

FTC Announces 2016 Thresholds for Premerger Notification Filings

Author: Charles H. Friedrich, III

Date: March 4, 2016

Key Contacts

Back

FTC Announces 2016 Thresholds for Premerger Notification Filings

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced revised thresholds that determine whether companies are required to notify federal antitrust authorities about a transaction under Section 7A of the Clayton Act. The new thresholds will apply to all transactions closing on or after February 25, 2016.

FTC Announces 2016 Thresholds for Premerger Notification Filings

Pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act), companies proposing a merger or acquisition must notify regulators and satisfy a mandatory waiting period (usually 30 days) if the size of the parties involved and the value of a transaction exceeds certain filing thresholds, absent an applicable exemption. The FTC revises the thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product (GNP).

Premerger Notification Thresholds

For 2016, the minimum size of transaction threshold will be $78.2 million, which represents a slight increase over the 2015 threshold of $76.3 million. Accordingly, if the merger or acquisition is valued at $78.2 million or more and the parties exceed certain size limits (one of the parties to the transaction has $156.3 million or more in annual net sales or total assets and the other has $15.6 million or more in annual net sales or total assets), both parties may be required to submit a Premerger Notification to the FTC and the Department of Justice. In addition, if the transaction is valued at $312.6 million or more, filing may be required, regardless of the size of the parties to the transaction.

Filing Fees

If premerger notification is required, the parties must complete a “Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions,” which requires information about each company’s business. The companies must also pay a filing fee, which is determined by the size of the transaction. As of February 26, 2016, the HSR filing fees will be:

  • Transaction valued in excess of $78.2 million but less than $156.3 million: $45,000
  • Transaction valued at $156.3 million or greater but less than $781.5 million: $125,000
  • Transaction valued at $781.5 million or greater: $280,000

Businesses should be aware that the penalties for failing to comply with the HSR Act are significant and may include fines of up to $16,000 per day for each day of violation. Due to the complexity of HSR filings, it is always wise to consult a business lawyer experienced in mergers and acquisitions.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips post image

Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips"
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation post image

Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation"
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce post image

How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce"
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes post image

10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]

Author: Paul Grossman

Link to post with title - "10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes"
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together post image

Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together"
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York post image

Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!