Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Will a New Jersey Court Enforce a Quasi-Contract?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: April 13, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

You don’t always need a binding contract to win a business lawsuit...

You don’t always need a binding contract to win a business lawsuit. In some cases, New Jersey courts will impose liability even though some of the essential elements of a contract are missing. These equitable remedies are based on “fairness,” and they are intended to redress the wrong suffered from the breaching party’s actions when traditional legal remedies are not available.

Will a New Jersey Court Enforce a Quasi-Contract?

Forming a Binding Contract

To start, it is always advisable to have a written contract that details the contract rights and remedies that are available if one party fails to perform. Under New Jersey contract law, the following elements are required to form a binding contract:

  • Meeting of the minds: the parties reached an agreement to (do what is alleged).
  • Offer and acceptance: one party communicated a willingness to enter into the agreement and the other party gave some outward indication that the agreement was accepted.
  • Consideration: each party gave or promised something of value to the other.
  • Certainty: the terms of the agreement were reasonably certain.

Of course, we don’t live in a perfect world, and business deals sometimes fall short of satisfying the above requirements. The good news is that you can often still file a New Jersey lawsuit to enforce the contract.

For instance, a contract may still be enforced even if there are missing terms. If essential terms are either agreed upon or may be inferred from conduct or context, a court can still enforce a contract even if there are missing non-essential terms In such cases, the court will often imply a term when the parties fail to do so. Additionally, the court may imply a term if it’s necessary to give a contract a reasonable construction. For instance, if a contract does not state its duration, the court may imply that the contract is to be performed or continue for a reasonable time, which may be determined based on the type of contract that it is, the past dealings of the parties, etc.

Equitable Remedies Under New Jersey Contract Law 

New Jersey also recognizes several equitable remedies that can be used to enforce an otherwise unenforceable contract. Below are the most common examples:

  • Promissory Estoppel: In some cases, a contract lacking consideration may be enforced, provided that the other party made a promise and you reasonably relied on that promise. Specifically, promissory estoppel requires you (the plaintiff) to show the following: the defendant made a clear and definite promise; the defendant expected that the promise would be relied upon; the plaintiff did reasonably rely on the promise; and the plaintiff’s reliance on the promise caused the plaintiff to suffer a definite and substantial detriment. 
  • Quantum Meruit: Even when the words and actions of the parties are insufficient to establish an intention to agree upon contract terms, a quasi-contract may be imposed by the law for the purpose of bringing about justice without reference to the intentions of the parties. To recover under the principle of quantum meruit, you must be able to prove all of the following factors: that plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant; that plaintiff conferred said benefit with a reasonable expectation that defendant would pay for it; and that the benefit was conferred under circumstances that should have put the defendant on notice that plaintiff expected to be paid. 
  • Unjust Enrichment: The doctrine of unjust enrichment is based on the principle that a person shall not be allowed to enrich himself unjustly at the expense of another. To recover under a theory of unjust enrichment, the plaintiff must show the following: that the defendant received a benefit; that retention of that benefit without payment would be unjust; that the plaintiff expected remuneration from the defendant at the time he conferred the benefit; and that a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have expected to provide remuneration for the benefit.

In order to convince a New Jersey court to order one of the above equitable remedies, you will need to provide evidence. In order to convince a New Jersey court to order one of the above equitable remedies, you will need to provide evidence. So, when there is no written contract, you will need documentation to back up your claims, such as email correspondence, written documents, invoices, or witness testimony.

If you have any questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Peter Yarem, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses post image

New York NDA Requirements for Businesses

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "New York NDA Requirements for Businesses"
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained post image

New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained"
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors post image

Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors"
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies post image

SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies"
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses post image

Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]

Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

Link to post with title - "Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses"
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!