As was widely reported a few months ago, Burger King is expected to complete a corporate inversion by purchasing Canadian donut company Tim Horton.
Spinning both companies into subsidiaries of a new, multinational fast-food company headquartered in Canada. New numbers released by tax watchdog Americans for Tax Fairness showed just how much Burger King will be saving after this move.
According to the report, the chain is already using aggressive tax planning to keep its bills as low as possible. As a result, its worldwide tax rate is one of the lowest of any U.S. fast food company at 27.5 percent in 2013. By structuring its international activities around low tax countries and loading costs onto U.S. operations, for example, the company is able to minimize its taxable income in America.
One example of the way that many companies do this is by moving the ownership of brands and logos to a subsidiary in a low tax region and then charging exorbitant rates to “arm’s length” subsidiaries in higher tax regions. This makes it appear that high tax subsidiaries are making little profit while low tax subsidiaries are making a lot.
The report looked into ways that Burger King could use its new status as a Canadian resident to avoid paying what would otherwise be U.S. taxes. It found that the company could avoid paying taxes on its current sum of $499 million in offshore profits – otherwise taxable under the U.S. “worldwide” tax scheme – to save $117. On future foreign earnings, this same change would save the company an estimated $275 million between 2015 and 2018. It also found that the top three holders of Burger King stock could use the unique structure of this deal to save on U.S. capital gains tax. The amount saved could be anywhere between $10 million and $820 million.
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
