James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Amid all of the recent news coverage of American multinational corporations inverting to redomicile in distant foreign countries, a massive deal is going down just next door. Burger King announced this morning that it reached a deal with Canadian fast food restaurant Tim Hortons, which primarily serves breakfast fare. If the proposed merger were to go through, the resultant company would be the world’s third-largest fast food restaurant chain, with a total of more than 18,000 outlets and roughly $22 billion in system sales.
At least part of this fervor likely comes from the plans to create a new, publicly traded company headquartered in Ontario Canada. Why Canada?
There are a number of benefits for Burger King in seeing this inversion through. First of all, Canada’s top corporate tax rate in Ontario is 26.5 percent, according to Forbes. This includes both the top federal rate of 15 percent and the provincial corporate tax rate of 11.5 percent, making for a significantly lower rate than the federal rate of 35 percent experienced by Burger King currently.
The hidden gem may be the Canadian treatment of a foreign affiliate’s “exempt surplus.” Dividends paid from exempt surplus are generally exempt from Canadian tax by virtue of a 100% dividends received deduction. Canada uses a combined exemption and credit system applies to dividends received from a foreign affiliate, including a Controlled Foreign Affiliate. Imagine all of the profits held offshore by US companies, such as Apple, Microsoft and Google escaping tax upon repatriation to the parent. Small wonder why Canada was chosen.
Burger King also operates in about 100 countries. This means that its earnings in foreign countries would be protected from the U.S. tax rate, as the U.S. is one of the only developed countries in the world to tax global income for corporations and individuals.
It is still too soon to tell what the long term effects of the Canadian government’s move will be.
Corporate tax inversion is an extremely hot topic right now in the United States, so much so, it has even spread into Canada. Frank Brunetti and I have been keeping up with this topic since the beginning. You can get involved and follow the story from some of our previous posts:
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, International Law & Trade
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.