James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Amid all of the recent news coverage of American multinational corporations inverting to redomicile in distant foreign countries, a massive deal is going down just next door. Burger King announced this morning that it reached a deal with Canadian fast food restaurant Tim Hortons, which primarily serves breakfast fare. If the proposed merger were to go through, the resultant company would be the world’s third-largest fast food restaurant chain, with a total of more than 18,000 outlets and roughly $22 billion in system sales.
At least part of this fervor likely comes from the plans to create a new, publicly traded company headquartered in Ontario Canada. Why Canada?
There are a number of benefits for Burger King in seeing this inversion through. First of all, Canada’s top corporate tax rate in Ontario is 26.5 percent, according to Forbes. This includes both the top federal rate of 15 percent and the provincial corporate tax rate of 11.5 percent, making for a significantly lower rate than the federal rate of 35 percent experienced by Burger King currently.
The hidden gem may be the Canadian treatment of a foreign affiliate’s “exempt surplus.” Dividends paid from exempt surplus are generally exempt from Canadian tax by virtue of a 100% dividends received deduction. Canada uses a combined exemption and credit system applies to dividends received from a foreign affiliate, including a Controlled Foreign Affiliate. Imagine all of the profits held offshore by US companies, such as Apple, Microsoft and Google escaping tax upon repatriation to the parent. Small wonder why Canada was chosen.
Burger King also operates in about 100 countries. This means that its earnings in foreign countries would be protected from the U.S. tax rate, as the U.S. is one of the only developed countries in the world to tax global income for corporations and individuals.
It is still too soon to tell what the long term effects of the Canadian government’s move will be.
Corporate tax inversion is an extremely hot topic right now in the United States, so much so, it has even spread into Canada. Frank Brunetti and I have been keeping up with this topic since the beginning. You can get involved and follow the story from some of our previous posts:
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, International Law & Trade
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.