Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 26, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Should the rule proposal become final, companies that focus on consumer financial products should expect to see a rise in class-action litigation.
The Dodd-Frank Act ordered the CFPB to study the use of arbitration clauses in consumer financial products and authorized the agency to issue regulations consistent with the study’s findings. In March, the CFPB published its findings, which included the conclusion that arbitration clauses restrict consumers’ relief for disputes with financial service providers by allowing companies to block group lawsuits.
Earlier this month, the CFPB outlined several regulatory proposals that it plans to submit to a Small Business Review Panel. This is the first step in the rulemaking process, which will likely take several years to complete. The new rules are also expected to be forward-looking and will not apply to existing contracts.
Most notably, the proposed rules would prohibit class action waivers in contracts for consumer financial products and services, including credit cards, checking and deposit accounts, prepaid cards, money transfer services, certain auto loans, auto title loans, small dollar or payday loans, private student loans, and installment loans. According CFPB Director Richard Cordray, arbitration clauses that block class-action litigation operate as a “free pass that prevents consumers from holding their financial providers directly accountable for the harm they cause when they violate the law.”
In good news for businesses, the CFPB proposals under consideration not to completely ban arbitration clauses. However, such clauses would have to explicitly state that they do not apply to cases filed as class actions unless and until the class certification is denied by the court or the class claims are dismissed in court. In addition, businesses that choose to use arbitration clauses for individual disputes must submit to the CFPB the arbitration claims filed and awards issued. According to the CFPB, the information provided would enable the CFPB to better understand and monitor arbitration cases.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!