Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm News
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 27, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhen the justices return to the bench for the October 2016 Term, they will consider a number of key commercial law issues. This post offers a brief summary of several business cases to watch that may interest New Jersey businesses.
In a case springing from Venezuela’s decision to nationalize its oil industry, the justices will consider how to interpret the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s (FSIA) expropriation exception. It provides in pertinent part, “[a] foreign state shall not be immune … in any case … in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue.”
The specific question before the Court is: “Whether the pleading standard for alleging that a case falls within the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s expropriation exception is more demanding than the standard for pleading jurisdiction under the federal question statute, which allows a jurisdictional dismissal only if the federal claim is wholly insubstantial and frivolous.” Accordingly, the decision is expected to clarify when businesses may sue a foreign government in U.S. courts for seizing property located overseas but owned by a U.S. firm.
The Supreme Court will consider how to define the term “parcel as a whole” in a regulatory taking case. In Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), the Court held that “in deciding whether a particular governmental action has effected a taking” the court should focus on “both on the character of the action and on the nature and extent of the interference with rights in the parcel as a whole…”
The lower courts are divided regarding whether the “parcel as a whole” concept created a rule that two legally distinct, but commonly owned contiguous parcels, must be combined for takings analysis purposes. The key issue in Murr — whether physically contiguous parcels that are owned by the same entity should be considered one parcel for purposes of a takings claim even if they are legally distinct — could have a significant impact on New Jersey developers.
The Court has agreed to consider federal court jurisdiction over mortgage disputes involving the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”). The congressional charter of Fannie Mae grants it the power “to sue and to be sued, and to complain and to defend, in any court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal.” The primary question before the Court is whether the phrase ‘to sue and be sued, and to complain and to defend, in any court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal’ confers original jurisdiction over every case brought by or against Fannie Mae to the federal courts.
The case centers on the Bankruptcy Code’s order of priorities. Section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code grants payment priority to some unsecured claims, including claims for certain wages and employee benefits earned before the bankruptcy filing. These priority claims must be paid in full before other unsecured claims may be paid from estate assets. In this chapter 11 case, the debtor agreed to settle a cause of action belonging to the estate. Rather than distributing the settlement proceeds under a confirmed plan of reorganization, the debtor then sought a “structured dismissal” of the bankruptcy case.
The dismissal order provided that the settlement proceeds would be paid to general unsecured creditors, rather than to petitioners, former employees of the debtor whose claims have priority over those of general unsecured creditors under Section 507. The justices have agreed to address a circuit split regarding “whether a bankruptcy court may authorize the distribution of settlement proceeds in a manner that violates the statutory priority scheme.”
The closely-watched anti-trust case challenges the way major banks establish fees for ATM use. The Court has specifically agreed to settle a division among the federal circuit courts regarding “whether allegations that members of a business association agreed to adhere to the association’s rules and possess governance rights in the association, without more, are sufficient to plead the element of conspiracy in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
FeedSpot Recognizes Donald Scarinci’s Government & Law Blog One of the Top 20 Public Law Blogs Little Falls, NJ – May 22, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is honored to share that Managing Partner Donald Scarinci’s Government & Law blog has been listed by FeedSpot.com as one of the “20 Best Public Law Blogs and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
SH Partner and 100th Bomb Group Foundation Legal Counsel Discussed The Nuremberg Trials and the Law May 21, 2025 – Little Falls, NJ – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to share that partner Ronald S. “Ron” Bienstock recently spoke at the 100th Bomb Group Biennial Reunion, held May 15-18, 2025, in New Orleans. The […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
Little Falls, NJ – May 1, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to share that Managing Partner Donald Scarinci’s Constitutional Law Reporter blog has been listed by FeedSpot.com as one of the “Top 100 Legal Blogs.” No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Feedspot, a content reader that curates websites of […]
Author: Donald Scarinci
Little Falls, NJ – May 1, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to share that Managing Partner Donald Scarinci’s Government & Law blog has been listed by FeedSpot.com as one of the “80 Best New Jersey Blogs and Websites in 2025.” *No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New […]
Author: Donald Scarinci
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for fourth consecutive year Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon has been named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for 2025. After four decades of practice, Nathanya’s pioneering influence in the field of special […]
Author: Nathanya G. Simon
Congratulations Angela Turiano on appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton April 17, 2025 – Little Falls, NJ – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC congratulates Partner Angela Turiano on her appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton. Along with serving as a member of SHRM Princeton’s leadership team, Angela will monitor pending legislative, regulatory, […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!