Earlier this year, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the “ABC test” should apply to determine whether a worker is an “independent contractor” for the purposes of the New Jersey Wage Payment Law and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law.
As expected, the decision regarding the “ABC Test” is already having a significant impact on employment suits.
In the wake of the precedential decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a putative class action against Sleepy’s, LLC. The plaintiffs in the case worked as delivery drivers for the mattress retailer. Their federal employment lawsuit alleges that they suffered various financial and non-financial losses as a result of defendant’s misclassification of them as independent contractors, rather than employees. The plaintiffs each signed an Independent Drive Agreement, which they maintain was designed to deny them employee benefits.
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the ABC test presumes that an individual is an employee unless an employer can show that:
The employer neither exercised control over the worker, nor had the ability to exercise control in terms of the completion of the work;
The services provided were either outside the usual course of business or performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise; and
The individual has a profession that will plainly persist despite termination of the challenged relationship.
Failure to satisfy any one of these three criteria results in an “employment” classification.
While the three-factor test is fairly straightforward, it assumes that a worker is an employee. As a result, employers like Sleepy’s often have an uphill battle when defending wage and hour suits.
Business Journal NJBIZ Names Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. Leaders in Law
Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. of Scarinci Hollenbeck Recognized as 2025 Leaders in Law by NJBIZ Little Falls, NJ – March 6, 2025 – One of New Jersey’s leading business journals, NJBIZ, has recognized Ronald S. Bienstock, Partner and Chair of the Intellectual Property Group, and William C. Sullivan, Jr., Partner and […]
Scarinci Hollenbeck Named Among 2025 Best Companies to Work For
Scarinci Hollenbeck Named in U.S. News & World Report’s 2025 Best Companies to Work For Law Firms Little Falls, NJ – March 4, 2025 − U.S. News & World Report, the global authority in rankings and consumer advice, has named Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC one of the best law firms to work for in its […]
Donald M. Pepe and Donald Scarinci Named to 2025 ROI-NJ Influencers: Law List
ROI-NJ Continues to Feature Donald Scarinci and Donald M. Pepe on Annual Influencers in Law List Little Falls, NJ – February 26, 2025 – Partner and Chair of Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC’s Commercial Real Estate Department Donald M. Pepe and Founding & Managing Partner Donald Scarinci have once again been named to ROI-NJ’s Influencers: Law […]
Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC Little Falls, NJ – February 20, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce the addition of one new Partner. The firm also welcomes three Senior Associate attorneys. The expansion strengthens the firm’s capabilities across several practice […]
Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Launch New BNI Chapter in NYC
Pioneering Networking Opportunities: James M. Meaney, Jesse M. Dimitro, and Christopher D. Warren Lead Initiative to Enhance Business Collaboration and Growth New York, NY – February 13, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that James M. Meaney, Jesse M. Dimitro, and Christopher D. Warren have taken the initiative to establish a […]
John M. Scagnelli Speaks at Annual Redevelopment Law Institute
John M. Scagnelli Featured as Panelist on “The Impact that the Proposed Resilient Environments and Landscapes (NJ PACT) Regulations will have on Redevelopment” Little Falls, NJ – January 29, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that Partner John M. Scagnelli, a member of the firm’s Environmental Law section, was recently featured […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
ABC Test Revives Sleepy’s Wage and Hour Suit
Author: Joel N. Kreizman
Earlier this year, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the “ABC test” should apply to determine whether a worker is an “independent contractor” for the purposes of the New Jersey Wage Payment Law and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law.
As expected, the decision regarding the “ABC Test” is already having a significant impact on employment suits.
In the wake of the precedential decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a putative class action against Sleepy’s, LLC. The plaintiffs in the case worked as delivery drivers for the mattress retailer. Their federal employment lawsuit alleges that they suffered various financial and non-financial losses as a result of defendant’s misclassification of them as independent contractors, rather than employees. The plaintiffs each signed an Independent Drive Agreement, which they maintain was designed to deny them employee benefits.
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the ABC test presumes that an individual is an employee unless an employer can show that:
The employer neither exercised control over the worker, nor had the ability to exercise control in terms of the completion of the work;
The services provided were either outside the usual course of business or performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise; and
The individual has a profession that will plainly persist despite termination of the challenged relationship.
Failure to satisfy any one of these three criteria results in an “employment” classification.
While the three-factor test is fairly straightforward, it assumes that a worker is an employee. As a result, employers like Sleepy’s often have an uphill battle when defending wage and hour suits.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
