Kenneth C. Oh
Counsel
212-784-6911 koh@sh-law.comFirm News
SEC Reviewing Rule Regarding Conflicting Proxy Proposals
Author: Kenneth C. Oh
Date: March 19, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
In January 2015, Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Mary Jo White recently directed agency staff to review the scope of Rule 14a-8(i)(9) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and report to the Commission on its review regarding conflicting proxy proposals.
In light of the directive, the Division of Corporation Finance announced that it would express no views on the application of the rule during the current proxy proposals season.
The Legal Background
Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, shareholders are authorized to submit proposals for inclusion in a company’s proxy materials for a vote at a shareholder meeting. The company must include the shareholder proposal in its proxy statement provided that the shareholder satisfies all of the procedural requirements, and the proposal does not fall under one of the rule’s exclusions.
For instance, Exchange Act Rule 14a-8(i)(9) allows a company to exclude a shareholder proposal if it “directly conflicts with one of the company’s own proposals to be submitted to shareholders at the same meeting.” Under the SEC’s interpretation of the rule, the shareholder proposal does not need to be identical in order to be excluded. Rather, exclusion is permissible if the proposal “would present alternative and conflicting decisions for the shareholders and would create the potential for inconsistent and ambiguous results.”
Questions have recently arisen regarding the application of Rule 14a-8(i)(9) to “proxy access” proposals in which shareholders seek to amend a corporation’s governing documents to allow them to nominate directors to the board. As these proposals have become more prevalent, so have no-action requests seeking to exclude them.
The Implications for Corporations
Given the inability to obtain no-action relief from the SEC, excluding a shareholder proposal on the basis of Rule 14a-8(i)(9) will be more risky during the 2015 proxy season. In addition to a potential SEC enforcement action, companies also run the risk of shareholder suits. Accordingly, corporations should consult with experienced counsel to explore their legal options.
- Business attorney New Jersey
- Business attorney NYC
- NJ attorney Scarinci
- Scarinci Hollenbeck
- Securities attorney NYC
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Nathanya G. Simon Named to ROI-NJ Influencers "Women in Business" 2025 List
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for fourth consecutive year Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Nathanya G. Simon has been named by ROI-NJ to the “ROI Influencers: Women in Business” list for 2025. After four decades of practice, Nathanya’s pioneering influence in the field of special […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
SH Partner Angela Turiano Named Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton
Congratulations Angela Turiano on appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton April 17, 2025 – Little Falls, NJ – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC congratulates Partner Angela Turiano on her appointment as Director of Legislative Affairs for SHRM Princeton. Along with serving as a member of SHRM Princeton’s leadership team, Angela will monitor pending legislative, regulatory, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Brittany P. Tarabour Nominated as Three-Year Trustee of the Monmouth Bar Association
Congratulations Brittany P. Tarabour for Nomination as Three-Year Trustee of the Monmouth Bar Association Red Bank, NJ – April 9, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC proudly congratulates Brittany P. Tarabour on her nomination by the Monmouth Bar Association to serve as a Three-Year Trustee. Founded in 1908, the Monmouth Bar Association is dedicated to […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Bloomberg Law Podcast Discusses Dua Lipa IP Victory with Ron Bienstock
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Ron Bienstock Featured on Bloomberg Law Podcast to Discuss Dua Lipa Copyright Infringement Lawsuits Little Falls, NJ – April 8, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC Partner and Chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property and Entertainment & Media departments Ronald S. Bienstock was recently featured on the Bloomberg Law podcast to discuss […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
NJ Super Lawyers Names Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys
Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys From Little Falls and Red Bank Named to 2025 New Jersey Super Lawyers List Little Falls, NJ – April 2, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys from both NJ offices were named to the 2025 New Jersey Super Lawyers and Rising Stars list. Each attorney was chosen in recognition of their […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Angela Turiano to Serve as Mock Arbitrator for Fordham Law Securities Arbitration Clinic
On Thursday, April 3, 2025, Partner Angela Turiano will make her fifth appearance as a mock arbitrator for the Securities Arbitration Clinic at the prestigious Fordham School of Law. Angela will draw on her years of experience to provide feedback to these future lawyers after making opening presentations and closing arguments, with the goal of […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.