Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm News

9 Changes In EU Trademark Reform

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: September 27, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

As of March 23, 2016, the European Parliament brought new changes into effect relating to the Community Trade Mark System, also known as Regulation (EU) 2015/2424.

EU Trademark Reform

The Community Trade Mark System (CTM), created in 1996, allowed brand owners to obtain registered protection for trademarks using one European Union (EU) filing. Filing one single trademark application carried forward to each of the 28 EU member states. The system has changed names and has some new rules to consider.

1. The first key change to the CTM is the nomenclature.

Both the system and the agency are now called European Union Trade Mark as opposed to Community Trade Mark. The office or agency that was in charge of handling trademark applications was previously called the Office for Harmonization of the Internal Market, popularly called OHIM; it’s now called the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

Anyone using a template for the application process and enforcement of the marks will need to update them to ensure that any contracts and provisions are in compliance with this change.

2. The change most interesting to brand owners is the change in the fee structure.

Before the change, you may obtain coverage for up to 3 classes for one official fee of €900. The new system will charge brand owners per class for each additional class. The official fees now are €850 for filing in one class; €900 in two classes; €1050 for three classes; and €150 for the fourth and each subsequent class thereafter. The new fee structure should save clients some money in the end because the renewals became substantially cheaper.

3. Items not covered in the Nice Classification heading must be indicated specifically in order to get coverage.

The Nice Classification, which is the international classification system used by almost 150 trademark offices in the world for classifying goods and services in trademark applications, goes by numbers and class headings. For example, Class 18 heading says, “Leather and imitations of leather and goods made of this material and not included in other classes: animal skins, hides, trunks and traveling bags, umbrellas and parasols, walking sticks, whips, harnesses, and saddlery.”

Before, for CTM applications “broad” specification of the classification number and just a heading was deemed to cover all goods and services within that particular class, even if they were not explicitly listed. If done so now, under the new system, the application will be deemed to cover exactly-and only-what the class heading states. So, to use the above example of Class 18, if you are a brand owner in the fashion industry, you will have to be careful. “Trunks and traveling bags” are mentioned in the class heading, but “handbags” are not. The application will not cover “handbags” unless they are specifically indicated.

Note: For marks applied before June 22, 2012, there is a 6-month window in which the brand owner can declare that their intention at the date of filing was to seek protection in respect of additional goods and services beyond those covered by the literal meaning of the class heading. However, if another brand owner began using the mark before the register was updated, rights cannot be enforced against that party.

4. Absolute grounds of refusal for your trademark application have expanded beyond shapes.

Before, absolute grounds of refusal only included shapes of a mark. The new system has expanded to include absolute grounds of refusal for:

  • whatever results from the nature of the relevant good (e.g., CASTFLOOR); or
  • the necessary factors to achieve a technical result (e.g., CARBON ELIMINATOR); or
  • something that gives substantial value to the goods (e.g., HEALTHY HAMP).

Additional grounds for absolute dismissal have been expanded to now also include:

  • Designation of origin; and
  • Geographical indication.

Note: Brand owners should stay away from marks that consist of geographical terms because they will be tougher to register.

5. It is easier now to register your non-traditional marks.

Putting those limitations aside, non-traditional marks (e.g., sounds, smells, motion, or holograms) are now more easily registrable at the EU level. It was always difficult to describe and graphically present these types of marks to represent the trademark. This presentation requirement has now been abolished. Brand owners can now define non-traditional marks in a manner which enables the public and relevant authorities to determine the clear and concise subject matter of the desired protection. A good example of this change is sound marks — before only sounds that were able to be presented in music notes may have been registered.

6. New certification marks for trade associations or other centralized commercial groups can now be registered.

As of October 1, 2017, certification marks will be available in the EU for the use of the mark as a sign for goods and services complying with applicable certification requirements, which will now be inconsistent with national systems.

7. The 5-year period for proof of use now starts ticking from the filing date or foreign priority, whichever is earlier.

This change only applies to oppositions that are filed on or after March 23, 2016. Previously, if a third party were to oppose your application you could require the opposer to submit proof that its mark was in use during the 5-year period measured from the last day of your mark’s publication. Under the new rules, the proof-of-use period has shifted to be 5 years measured from your filing date, or priority date, whichever is earlier.

8. “Own name” defense is no longer available, except for natural persons.

If you are using a registered trade mark as a trade name or company now, it may be deemed infringement of a third party’s right.

To avoid such an infringement, we recommend that trademark owners subscribe to a company name watch. Our firm provides this service, not just for a company name watch but also for any name watch.

9. Trademark owners can now seize goods in transit.

Before the change, items simply passing through the European Union, not to be sold there, could not be classified as counterfeit. Now, with a European Union Trade Mark registration items can be seized in transit unless the presumed infringer can show that he or she is entitled to sell those goods in the final destination country.

Note: We recommend to brand owners having problems with counterfeits outside the EU to consider obtaining EU trade mark registrations and EU customs registrations.

While the list above is a general review of the recent changes, we advise brand owners to review their trademark portfolios.

If you have any questions or concerns about your EU trademark or other IP considerations in any jurisdiction, please contact us anytime.

    No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

    Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

    Related Posts

    See all
    Business Journal NJBIZ Names Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. Leaders in Law post image

    Business Journal NJBIZ Names Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. Leaders in Law

    Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. of Scarinci Hollenbeck Recognized as 2025 Leaders in Law by NJBIZ Little Falls, NJ – March 6, 2025 – One of New Jersey’s leading business journals, NJBIZ, has recognized Ronald S. Bienstock, Partner and Chair of the Intellectual Property Group, and William C. Sullivan, Jr., Partner and […]

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    Link to post with title - "Business Journal NJBIZ Names Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. Leaders in Law"
    Scarinci Hollenbeck Named Among 2025 Best Companies to Work For post image

    Scarinci Hollenbeck Named Among 2025 Best Companies to Work For

    Scarinci Hollenbeck Named in U.S. News & World Report’s 2025 Best Companies to Work For Law Firms Little Falls, NJ  – March 4, 2025 − U.S. News & World Report, the global authority in rankings and consumer advice, has named Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC one of the best law firms to work for in its […]

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Named Among 2025 Best Companies to Work For"
    Donald M. Pepe and Donald Scarinci Named to 2025 ROI-NJ Influencers: Law List post image

    Donald M. Pepe and Donald Scarinci Named to 2025 ROI-NJ Influencers: Law List

    ROI-NJ Continues to Feature Donald Scarinci and Donald M. Pepe on Annual Influencers in Law List Little Falls, NJ – February 26, 2025 – Partner and Chair of Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC’s Commercial Real Estate Department Donald M. Pepe and Founding & Managing Partner Donald Scarinci have once again been named to ROI-NJ’s Influencers: Law […]

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    Link to post with title - "Donald M. Pepe and Donald Scarinci Named to 2025 ROI-NJ Influencers: Law List"
    Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC post image

    Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC

    Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC Little Falls, NJ – February 20, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce the addition of one new Partner. The firm also welcomes three Senior Associate attorneys. The expansion strengthens the firm’s capabilities across several practice […]

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    Link to post with title - "Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC"
    Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Launch New BNI Chapter in NYC post image

    Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Launch New BNI Chapter in NYC

    Pioneering Networking Opportunities: James M. Meaney, Jesse M. Dimitro, and Christopher D. Warren Lead Initiative to Enhance Business Collaboration and Growth New York, NY – February 13, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that James M. Meaney, Jesse M. Dimitro, and Christopher D. Warren have taken the initiative to establish a […]

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Launch New BNI Chapter in NYC"
    John M. Scagnelli Speaks at Annual Redevelopment Law Institute post image

    John M. Scagnelli Speaks at Annual Redevelopment Law Institute

    John M. Scagnelli Featured as Panelist on “The Impact that the Proposed Resilient Environments and Landscapes (NJ PACT) Regulations will have on Redevelopment” Little Falls, NJ – January 29, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that Partner John M. Scagnelli, a member of the firm’s Environmental Law section, was recently featured […]

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    Link to post with title - "John M. Scagnelli Speaks at Annual Redevelopment Law Institute"

    No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

    Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

    Explore What Matters Most to You.

    Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

    Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

    9 Changes In EU Trademark Reform

    Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

    As of March 23, 2016, the European Parliament brought new changes into effect relating to the Community Trade Mark System, also known as Regulation (EU) 2015/2424.

    EU Trademark Reform

    The Community Trade Mark System (CTM), created in 1996, allowed brand owners to obtain registered protection for trademarks using one European Union (EU) filing. Filing one single trademark application carried forward to each of the 28 EU member states. The system has changed names and has some new rules to consider.

    1. The first key change to the CTM is the nomenclature.

    Both the system and the agency are now called European Union Trade Mark as opposed to Community Trade Mark. The office or agency that was in charge of handling trademark applications was previously called the Office for Harmonization of the Internal Market, popularly called OHIM; it’s now called the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

    Anyone using a template for the application process and enforcement of the marks will need to update them to ensure that any contracts and provisions are in compliance with this change.

    2. The change most interesting to brand owners is the change in the fee structure.

    Before the change, you may obtain coverage for up to 3 classes for one official fee of €900. The new system will charge brand owners per class for each additional class. The official fees now are €850 for filing in one class; €900 in two classes; €1050 for three classes; and €150 for the fourth and each subsequent class thereafter. The new fee structure should save clients some money in the end because the renewals became substantially cheaper.

    3. Items not covered in the Nice Classification heading must be indicated specifically in order to get coverage.

    The Nice Classification, which is the international classification system used by almost 150 trademark offices in the world for classifying goods and services in trademark applications, goes by numbers and class headings. For example, Class 18 heading says, “Leather and imitations of leather and goods made of this material and not included in other classes: animal skins, hides, trunks and traveling bags, umbrellas and parasols, walking sticks, whips, harnesses, and saddlery.”

    Before, for CTM applications “broad” specification of the classification number and just a heading was deemed to cover all goods and services within that particular class, even if they were not explicitly listed. If done so now, under the new system, the application will be deemed to cover exactly-and only-what the class heading states. So, to use the above example of Class 18, if you are a brand owner in the fashion industry, you will have to be careful. “Trunks and traveling bags” are mentioned in the class heading, but “handbags” are not. The application will not cover “handbags” unless they are specifically indicated.

    Note: For marks applied before June 22, 2012, there is a 6-month window in which the brand owner can declare that their intention at the date of filing was to seek protection in respect of additional goods and services beyond those covered by the literal meaning of the class heading. However, if another brand owner began using the mark before the register was updated, rights cannot be enforced against that party.

    4. Absolute grounds of refusal for your trademark application have expanded beyond shapes.

    Before, absolute grounds of refusal only included shapes of a mark. The new system has expanded to include absolute grounds of refusal for:

    • whatever results from the nature of the relevant good (e.g., CASTFLOOR); or
    • the necessary factors to achieve a technical result (e.g., CARBON ELIMINATOR); or
    • something that gives substantial value to the goods (e.g., HEALTHY HAMP).

    Additional grounds for absolute dismissal have been expanded to now also include:

    • Designation of origin; and
    • Geographical indication.

    Note: Brand owners should stay away from marks that consist of geographical terms because they will be tougher to register.

    5. It is easier now to register your non-traditional marks.

    Putting those limitations aside, non-traditional marks (e.g., sounds, smells, motion, or holograms) are now more easily registrable at the EU level. It was always difficult to describe and graphically present these types of marks to represent the trademark. This presentation requirement has now been abolished. Brand owners can now define non-traditional marks in a manner which enables the public and relevant authorities to determine the clear and concise subject matter of the desired protection. A good example of this change is sound marks — before only sounds that were able to be presented in music notes may have been registered.

    6. New certification marks for trade associations or other centralized commercial groups can now be registered.

    As of October 1, 2017, certification marks will be available in the EU for the use of the mark as a sign for goods and services complying with applicable certification requirements, which will now be inconsistent with national systems.

    7. The 5-year period for proof of use now starts ticking from the filing date or foreign priority, whichever is earlier.

    This change only applies to oppositions that are filed on or after March 23, 2016. Previously, if a third party were to oppose your application you could require the opposer to submit proof that its mark was in use during the 5-year period measured from the last day of your mark’s publication. Under the new rules, the proof-of-use period has shifted to be 5 years measured from your filing date, or priority date, whichever is earlier.

    8. “Own name” defense is no longer available, except for natural persons.

    If you are using a registered trade mark as a trade name or company now, it may be deemed infringement of a third party’s right.

    To avoid such an infringement, we recommend that trademark owners subscribe to a company name watch. Our firm provides this service, not just for a company name watch but also for any name watch.

    9. Trademark owners can now seize goods in transit.

    Before the change, items simply passing through the European Union, not to be sold there, could not be classified as counterfeit. Now, with a European Union Trade Mark registration items can be seized in transit unless the presumed infringer can show that he or she is entitled to sell those goods in the final destination country.

    Note: We recommend to brand owners having problems with counterfeits outside the EU to consider obtaining EU trade mark registrations and EU customs registrations.

    While the list above is a general review of the recent changes, we advise brand owners to review their trademark portfolios.

    If you have any questions or concerns about your EU trademark or other IP considerations in any jurisdiction, please contact us anytime.

    Let`s get in touch!

    * The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

    Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!

    Please select a category(s) below: