Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm News

Understanding the Risks and Benefits of Remote Legal Proceedings

Author: Joel N. Kreizman

Date: May 28, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has forced us to change the way we conduct everyday activities…

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has forced us to change the way we conduct everyday activities. Court proceedings, arbitrations, and mediations are no exception, and parties to such proceedings increasingly rely on video conferencing to go “virtual.” While technology can allow proceedings to go forward during the pandemic, there are potential downsides to consider.

Understanding the Risks and Benefits of Remote Legal Proceedings

Legal Proceedings Go Virtual

In New Jersey, courts have cancelled in-person proceedings, and a wide range of court events now proceed through phone or video conference. Since transitioning to virtual operations, New Jersey state courts have conducted more than 12,000 remote court events involving more than 80,000 participants, according to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Arbitration and mediation proceedings are also being conducted online with greater frequency. JAMS and the American Arbitration Association are both offering virtual mediation and arbitration. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has also administratively postponed all scheduled in-person arbitration and mediation proceedings through July 31, 2020. FINRA Dispute Resolution is offering virtual hearing services (via Zoom and teleconference) to parties in all cases by joint agreement or by panel order.

Risk and Benefits of Remote Legal Proceedings

New Jersey courts can and have required cases to proceed virtually; but in many cases, the parties are asked or required to give consent before proceedings are conducted remotely. It is important to understand the risks and benefits of virtual proceedings before making such a decision. The obvious benefit of virtual proceedings is that the parties can move forward without delay. Allowing proceedings to continue may help ensure that the time and resources already devoted to a case are not lost, and in appropriate cases, virtual proceedings may sufficiently resemble traditional proceedings to serve as an adequate substitute. Through the use of video conferencing platforms, such as Zoom, the parties, counsel, and the judge or other fact-finder can see, hear and engage with each other. Counsel can submit evidence and other exhibits, witnesses may be questioned, and the judge or fact-finder can render decisions. Virtual proceedings may, therefore, help parties achieve resolution of a matter in an efficient and timely manner.

Virtual hearings and trials cannot completely mimic in-person proceedings, though, so it is important to understand the potential risks and to assess the requirements of your particular case before committing to go virtual. The following are some of the considerations that counsel should consider before choosing to proceed virtually or if compelled to do so by a court.

  1. Confidentiality:  A paramount concern is confidentiality. For cases involving intellectual property or sensitive financial information, for example, it is critical to verify that security protocols are in place to prevent confidential information from being obtained by a non-party.
  2. Technical Issues:  Technical issues can also prevent virtual proceedings from adequately resembling live ones. Parties should be sure that they understand how the platform works and especially how sharing documents and exhibits will work. Many platforms allow the parties to practice using them ahead of time. It is also advisable to have a tech expert available during a proceeding should issues arise.
  3. Procedural Obstacles:  The lack of clear procedures for virtual proceedings can be problematic. Prior to the proceedings, all of the participants should make sure they are on the same page by agreeing to a detailed written protocol that describes procedures for exchanging exhibits, examining witnesses, and other logistical issues.
  4. Case-Specific Considerations:  Counsel weighing whether to proceed virtually should of course consider whether doing so would interfere with the effective presentation of their case. If attorneys and their clients participate in a proceeding from separate locations in order to maintain social distancing, the possibility of discrete and immediate communication between them in response to developments during the proceeding may be lost. Counsel must also make considered judgments about the particular dynamics of their case and how witnesses may be affected by giving testimony in a less formal, virtual environment. Certain witnesses, for example, may be less disciplined if testifying in a familiar setting rather than in the immediate presence of a judge or fact-finder. Similarly, if counsel expects cross-examination of an opposition witness to play an important part in a case, counsel should consider whether that witness might be more composed or self-assured taking questions from home rather than in a courtroom or other more formal setting.
  5. Fact-Finder Engagement:  Another significant concern about virtual proceedings is that the finder(s) of fact may not be as engaged as they would be with face-to-face interaction. Wunderlich Securities Inc. (“Wunderlich”) is seeking to vacate an $11.4 million award issued by a FINRA panel, citing the panel’s apparent inattention during the arbitration’s final hearing conducted via Zoom. In its petition to vacate, Wunderlich alleges that one arbitrator frequently looked at other screens, another blocked her screen for a period of time, and another walked away from the screen during closing arguments.
  6. Finality:  The Wunderlich petition also highlights another potential risk of remote proceedings — parties who are unhappy with the end result may invoke the fact that the proceeding was conducted virtually as grounds for overturning the decision. Whether justified or not, such claims may stretch out the duration of a case and increase costs unnecessarily. Moreover, this possibility undermines a central rationale for proceeding virtually — that virtual proceedings can facilitate achieving closure efficiently.

Key Takeaway

These unprecedented times are forcing all of us to adapt. As we rely on new ways of doing things, there is always a learning curve. As always, educating yourself, and relying on experienced legal advisors to guide you, can help minimize the uncertainties.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact us at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Scarinci Hollenbeck Named a 2026 NJBIZ Empowering Women Honoree post image

Scarinci Hollenbeck Named a 2026 NJBIZ Empowering Women Honoree

NJBIZ recognizes the firm for advancing women in the workplace and in the community Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that it has been named a 2026 NJBIZ Empowering Women honoree. The program recognizes New Jersey companies and organizations for tangible, innovative efforts to advance women in the workplace and in the community. The […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Named a 2026 NJBIZ Empowering Women Honoree"
Scarinci Hollenbeck Continues Growth, Adding Four Attorneys Across the Firm post image

Scarinci Hollenbeck Continues Growth, Adding Four Attorneys Across the Firm

The firm has added 20 legal professionals since May, with the latest group bringing a new partner, counsel, and associates to its New Jersey offices. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC today announced four new attorneys joining its New Jersey offices: Denis G. Murphy as Partner, Michael B. Mietlicki as Counsel in the Litigation Group, and Kimberly Diaz […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Continues Growth, Adding Four Attorneys Across the Firm"
Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Brian Spector Produces New Entertainment Podcast "What Exit?" post image

Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Brian Spector Produces New Entertainment Podcast "What Exit?"

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Brian D. Spector is producing What Exit?, a new entertainment podcast featuring industry news and guests from the Garden State. Hosted by Jared Goldsmith (Dear Evan Hansen), the podcast premiered on Saturday, August 29, 2026, and is available on Spotify and YouTube. What Exit? takes its […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Partner Brian Spector Produces New Entertainment Podcast "What Exit?""
Sean Pena Joins Montclair State University as Adjunct Professor post image

Sean Pena Joins Montclair State University as Adjunct Professor

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Sean M. Pena, a Partner in the firm’s Litigation group, has been appointed as an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. He will teach Perspectives on Law: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications of United States Legal Systems during the […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Sean Pena Joins Montclair State University as Adjunct Professor"
Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Best Lawyers in America® post image

Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Best Lawyers in America®

Nine Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized in 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers in America® Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that nine of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America®. First published in 1983, Best Lawyers is universally regarded […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Best Lawyers in America®"
Scarinci Hollenbeck Awards Second Annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law post image

Scarinci Hollenbeck Awards Second Annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Environmental Law Scholarship Recipient Talha Iqbal! Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has awarded the second annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law to Talha Iqbal, a rising third-year student at Rutgers Law School in Newark. Mr. Iqbal will receive $2,500 to support his continued legal education. The Environmental Law Scholarship is awarded annually […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Scarinci Hollenbeck Awards Second Annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!