Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 28, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Scrutiny of the cryptocurrency industry continues to grow, with both state and federal regulators arguing that more needs to be done to protect investors. On October 19, 2023, the New York Office of Attorney General filed suit against cryptocurrency companies Gemini Trust Company (Gemini), Genesis Global Capital, LLC, and its affiliates (Genesis), and Digital Currency Group, Inc. (DCG), alleging that the companies defrauded investors out of more than $1 billion.
Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler made it clear that the SEC also isn’t taking its foot off the accelerator when it comes to crypto enforcement. In a speech delivered on October 25, 2023, at the 2023 Securities Enforcement Forum, Gensler highlighted the SEC’s crypto enforcement successes and vowed to continue pursuing bad actors. “This is a field rife with fraud, scams, bankruptcies, and money laundering,” he said. “It’s reminiscent of what we had in the 1920s before the federal securities laws were put in place.”
On October 19, 2023, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Gemini, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins. She also targeted Genesis, a significant institutional cryptocurrency lender, involved in the Gemini Earn investment program. Under the program, investors deposited their digital assets with Gemini, and Genesis then lent them out to third parties, promising returns of up to eight percent.
The NY OAG suit alleges that DCG and Genesis concealed losses by entering a $1.1 billion promissory note. DCG agreed to pay Genesis $1.1 billion over a decade with a one percent interest rate. Gemini concealed risky loans from investors, including high concentration with Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda, according to the lawsuit. Investors were not informed.
Genesis is accused of hiding over $1.1 billion in losses from investors, Gemini, and the public. In June 2022, one of Genesis’ largest borrowers, Three Arrows Capital, defaulted on billions in loans. Around the same time, Genesis lost more than $100 million from another borrower, Babel Finance. In total, Genesis had lost more than $1.1 billion, according to the suit.
The NY OAG’s suit maintains that to conceal these losses, DCG and Genesis entered into a $1.1 billion promissory note, in which DCG agreed to pay Genesis $1.1 billion in a decade at only a one percent interest rate. The lawsuit alleges the promissory note aimed to defraud Gemini Earn investors and deceive the public about Genesis’ financial status. “Gemini hid the risks of investing with Genesis and Genesis lied to the public about its losses,” said James.
The lawsuit could have serious repercussions for all of the crypto defendants. NYOAG aims to ban Gemini, Genesis, DCG, and their executives from New York’s securities and commodities transactions. The suit also seeks restitution for all defrauded investors and disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains.
The SEC initiated a suit against Genesis and Gemini this year for unregistered securities related to Earn.
The agency took high-profile actions this year, targeting individuals like Samuel Bankman-Fried and Changpeng Zhao, along with Coinbase Global.
The ongoing debate over when crypto assets constitute securities has not slowed the SEC’s enforcement actions. In his speech, Gessler reiterated his stance that many crypto assets meet the Howie test used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, thus, is considered a security under federal law. “Without prejudging any one asset, the vast majority of crypto assets likely meet the investment contract test, making them subject to the securities laws,” Gessler stated. He argued that crypto intermediaries dealing with these assets are also subject to securities laws.
Of course, many crypto companies do not share the SEC’s stance. Several of the agency’s enforcement targets, including Coinbase, have challenged the agency’s crypto authority. These suits could clarify crypto asset classification as securities, requiring close monitoring by affected entities.
Regulators, like the SEC and NY AOG, target unregistered securities and actively combat crypto-based investment fraud. Before financial engagements, both crypto businesses and investors should prioritize thorough due diligence to prevent potential losses.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!