Scrutiny of the cryptocurrency industry continues to grow, with both state and federal regulators arguing that more needs to be done to protect investors. On October 19, 2023, the New York Office of Attorney General filed suit against cryptocurrency companies Gemini Trust Company (Gemini), Genesis Global Capital, LLC, and its affiliates (Genesis), and Digital Currency Group, Inc. (DCG), alleging that the companies defrauded investors out of more than $1 billion.
Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler made it clear that the SEC also isn’t taking its foot off the accelerator when it comes to crypto enforcement. In a speech delivered on October 25, 2023, at the 2023 Securities Enforcement Forum, Gensler highlighted the SEC’s crypto enforcement successes and vowed to continue pursuing bad actors. “This is a field rife with fraud, scams, bankruptcies, and money laundering,” he said. “It’s reminiscent of what we had in the 1920s before the federal securities laws were put in place.”
NY OAG Suit Against Gemini
On October 19, 2023, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Gemini, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins. She also targeted Genesis, a significant institutional cryptocurrency lender, involved in the Gemini Earn investment program. Under the program, investors deposited their digital assets with Gemini, and Genesis then lent them out to third parties, promising returns of up to eight percent.
The NY OAG suit alleges that DCG and Genesis concealed losses by entering a $1.1 billion promissory note. DCG agreed to pay Genesis $1.1 billion over a decade with a one percent interest rate. Gemini concealed risky loans from investors, including high concentration with Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda, according to the lawsuit. Investors were not informed.
Genesis is accused of hiding over $1.1 billion in losses from investors, Gemini, and the public. In June 2022, one of Genesis’ largest borrowers, Three Arrows Capital, defaulted on billions in loans. Around the same time, Genesis lost more than $100 million from another borrower, Babel Finance. In total, Genesis had lost more than $1.1 billion, according to the suit.
A Closer Look at the NY OAG’s Lawsuit and Its Implications for Crypto Defendants
The NY OAG’s suit maintains that to conceal these losses, DCG and Genesis entered into a $1.1 billion promissory note, in which DCG agreed to pay Genesis $1.1 billion in a decade at only a one percent interest rate. The lawsuit alleges the promissory note aimed to defraud Gemini Earn investors and deceive the public about Genesis’ financial status. “Gemini hid the risks of investing with Genesis and Genesis lied to the public about its losses,” said James.
The lawsuit could have serious repercussions for all of the crypto defendants. NYOAG aims to ban Gemini, Genesis, DCG, and their executives from New York’s securities and commodities transactions. The suit also seeks restitution for all defrauded investors and disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains.
SEC Crypto Enforcement
The SEC initiated a suit against Genesis and Gemini this year for unregistered securities related to Earn. The agency took high-profile actions this year, targeting individuals like Samuel Bankman-Fried and Changpeng Zhao, along with Coinbase Global.
The ongoing debate over when crypto assets constitute securities has not slowed the SEC’s enforcement actions. In his speech, Gessler reiterated his stance that many crypto assets meet the Howie test used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, thus, is considered a security under federal law. “Without prejudging any one asset, the vast majority of crypto assets likely meet the investment contract test, making them subject to the securities laws,” Gessler stated. He argued that crypto intermediaries dealing with these assets are also subject to securities laws.
Of course, many crypto companies do not share the SEC’s stance. Several of the agency’s enforcement targets, including Coinbase, have challenged the agency’s crypto authority. These suits could clarify crypto asset classification as securities, requiring close monitoring by affected entities.
Key Takeaway
Regulators, like the SEC and NY AOG, target unregistered securities and actively combat crypto-based investment fraud. Before financial engagements, both crypto businesses and investors should prioritize thorough due diligence to prevent potential losses.
When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework
Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now
Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses
When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know
For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law
As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions
In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
