Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Will President Trump Increase China Sanctions in His Lame Duck Session?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: November 24, 2020

Key Contacts

Back
Will President Trump Increase China Sanctions in His Lame Duck Session?

According to multiple sources, President Donald Trump plans to increase sanctions on China in his final months in office

President Donald Trump plans to increase sanctions on China in his final months in office, according to multiple sources. For businesses with interests in China, the situation warrants close monitoring, particularly given that President-elect Joe Biden may not immediately reverse course when he takes office in January.

Recent Sanctions Against China

On November 13, 2020, President Trump issued Executive Order 13959, “Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments that Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies.” The EO prohibits U.S. investors from purchasing the securities of a “Communist Chinese military company.” In support of the ban, the Executive Order maintains that the “People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) military-industrial complex, by directly supporting the efforts of the PRC’s military, intelligence, and other security apparatuses, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.”

The Executive Order expressly prohibits “any transaction in publicly traded securities, or any securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide investment exposure to such securities, of any Communist Chinese military company as defined in section 4(a)(i) of this order, by any United States person.” The definition of  “Communist Chinese military company” includes those previously identified pursuant to Section 1237 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (the Department of Defense identified 31 companies in June and August 2020), along with any person determined in the future by the Secretaries of Defense or Treasury to meet the criteria of a “Communist Chinese military company.” Meanwhile, the definition of “US person” includes any U.S. citizen or permanent resident alien, any person in the United States, or any entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches)

The prohibitions will take effect on January 11, 2021. For companies identified as Communist Chinese military companies after the date of the Executive Order, the prohibitions will take effect 60 days after their identification. Violations of the EO may result in civil and criminal penalties under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

Additional China Sanctions Likely Under Trump Administration

Officials within the Administration have stated that further sanctions against China are a top priority as President Trump enters the “lame duck” phase of his presidency.

In recent remarks to the Ronald Reagan Institute, Secretary of State Michael Pompeo stated that the U.S. is “not finished yet” when it comes to getting tough on China. He characterized the Chinese Communist Party as a “Marxist-Leninist monster” whose rule is “authoritarian, brutish and antithetical to human freedom.”

According to an Axios report, the Trump Administration is contemplating expanding the DoD list of prohibited Chinese military companies, as well as cracking down on China’s use of forced labor in the fishing industry. President Trump’s new Defense Secretary Christopher Miller has also been ordered to focus on Chinese threats, including the county’s use of cyber warfare.

The actions taken by the Trump Administration are also intended to make its China policy difficult to reverse once President-elect Biden takes office. John Ullyot, National Security Council spokesperson, told Axios: “Unless Beijing reverses course and becomes a responsible player on the global stage, future US presidents will find it politically suicidal to reverse President Trump’s historic actions.”

Key Takeaway

Businesses, particularly those with interests in China, are facing a tumultuous few months in light of the Presidential transition and escalating COVID-19 crisis. With this in mind, it is imperative to stay on top of legal updates and consult with experienced legal counsel regarding how any changes, such as sanctions and investment restrictions, may impact your operations.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!